Jump to content

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Camp Evidence Packet List 2017


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 TheSnowball

TheSnowball

    Hall of Fame

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,386 posts
821
Excellent
  • Name:Ryan

Posted 19 June 2017 - 05:33 AM

Camp Evidence Packet List 2017

Send me a link to a camp that has released an evidence packet or post it here as a reply if you would like me to add it to this list.

 

Links with Pre-Camp Packet

 

ENDI

 

Wake RKS

 

HHS or SDI

 

UTNIF

 

Michigan

 

Northwestern

 

Links without Pre-Camp Packet


Edited by TheSnowball, Today, 01:56 PM.

  • 7
If you want your Baudrillard link, you can pry it from my cold, biologically dead hands.

Daily Evidence Card!

Exodus Files!

#2 outlier

outlier

    Varsity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 41 posts
18
Good

Posted 19 June 2017 - 06:47 AM

Georgetown's evidence:

https://gds17.wikispaces.com/Evidence

Edited by outlier, 19 June 2017 - 06:47 AM.

  • 5

#3 HEYEYEYEYEYEY

HEYEYEYEYEYEY

    Varsity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 35 posts
16
Good

Posted 19 June 2017 - 08:59 AM

Michigan: https://sites.google...michdebate/home

 

Northwestern: https://sites.google...einstitute/home


  • 4

#4 NickDB8

NickDB8

    Exodus Files Forum Representative

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 582 posts
335
Excellent
  • Name:Nick
  • School:Emporia HS

Posted 22 June 2017 - 10:43 AM

UT: http://utdebatecamp..../uncategorized/
  • 5

Exodus Files - Updated 5/21! Grab our new STEM Affirmative for the upcoming education topic!

Research Tools


#5 CalculusBC

CalculusBC

    Least's best

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 157 posts
83
Excellent
  • Name:Benny Cupo
  • School:UT Austin

Posted 22 June 2017 - 02:09 PM

I hope y'all like SP2 from UT :) 


  • 1

I wonder if I actually understand half the arguments I go for, or if judges are just confused and think I'm right because I sound confident in my explanation...


#6 PailAmbrose

PailAmbrose

    Champion

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 269 posts
121
Excellent
  • Name:Paul
  • School:KSU

Posted 22 June 2017 - 02:15 PM

I hope y'all like SP2 from UT :)

I had started writing this aff but I couldn't find any good plans/solvency - this is exactly what I needed, thanks a lot

Edited by PailAmbrose, 22 June 2017 - 02:16 PM.

  • 1

"They have done the most destructive, entirely insane thing that has ever been done. They've degraded debate. it's offensive. I'm sorry that you judges have had to listen to this, it's people like them that have destroyed the debate community"

 

-Missouri's reaction to a cap K


#7 ConsultVerminSupreme

ConsultVerminSupreme

    Vermin Supremacist

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 415 posts
434
Excellent
  • Name:Amogh Dendukuri
  • School:University of California, Riverside

Posted 22 June 2017 - 03:05 PM

smh I spent the last month writing a Lewis/Agamben Study Aff, and then UT just puts out an entire Aff starter pack and Neg answers for it feelsbad


Edited by ConsultVerminSupreme, 22 June 2017 - 03:06 PM.

  • 4

Swiggity Swogh, the name is Amogh!


#8 CalculusBC

CalculusBC

    Least's best

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 157 posts
83
Excellent
  • Name:Benny Cupo
  • School:UT Austin

Posted 22 June 2017 - 05:35 PM

I hope y'all like the case neg for SP2, because cutting it was a hassle. I deadass couldn't find any "AOUM good" OR "REHYA bad" evidence. I would like to know what y'all think of the cards I cut, so just Ctrl+F Calculus BC and give me your honest opinion. Most of my cards are in the Neg file, but I got some into the Aff file as well. If the more seasoned researchers on this site would give me some advice to improve that would be fantastic. 


  • 0

I wonder if I actually understand half the arguments I go for, or if judges are just confused and think I'm right because I sound confident in my explanation...


#9 vmanAA738

vmanAA738

    Top Speaker

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 526 posts
159
Excellent
  • Name:Vinay
  • School:UC Berkeley

Posted Today, 01:28 PM

Michigan and Northwestern both have their starter packs out


  • 0

in the UC machine


#10 NotMyAltAccount

NotMyAltAccount

    Junior-Varsity

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
6
Okay
  • Name:Real Name
  • School:Real School

Posted Today, 02:45 PM

I hope y'all like the case neg for SP2, because cutting it was a hassle. I deadass couldn't find any "AOUM good" OR "REHYA bad" evidence. I would like to know what y'all think of the cards I cut, so just Ctrl+F Calculus BC and give me your honest opinion. Most of my cards are in the Neg file, but I got some into the Aff file as well. If the more seasoned researchers on this site would give me some advice to improve that would be fantastic. 

why the substantial T? Like its dumb


  • 0

#11 CalculusBC

CalculusBC

    Least's best

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 157 posts
83
Excellent
  • Name:Benny Cupo
  • School:UT Austin

Posted Today, 02:52 PM

why the substantial T? Like its dumb

that's what I said when they told me to cut it. I wanted to cut T-regulations personally because I thought it would be more strategic. The idea behind substantial was to get the novice kids used to reading and answering T.

T-substantial is always trash in my opinion, but it was only 10 minutes of work to find the cards, cut them, and make the shells.

Edited by CalculusBC, Today, 02:53 PM.

  • 0

I wonder if I actually understand half the arguments I go for, or if judges are just confused and think I'm right because I sound confident in my explanation...


#12 NotMyAltAccount

NotMyAltAccount

    Junior-Varsity

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 15 posts
6
Okay
  • Name:Real Name
  • School:Real School

Posted Today, 03:01 PM

that's what I said when they told me to cut it. I wanted to cut T-regulations personally because I thought it would be more strategic. The idea behind substantial was to get the novice kids used to reading and answering T.
T-substantial is always trash in my opinion, but it was only 10 minutes of work to find the cards, cut them, and make the shells.


That's cool, just didnt know if you made the call to make it substantial t
  • 1





Similar Topics Collapse

4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 1 anonymous users