Jump to content

Photo
- - - - -

Gender nihilism


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 jbh428

jbh428

    Varsity

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 43 posts
4
Okay
  • Name:Jackson
  • School:Crossings Christian School

Posted 16 February 2017 - 10:21 AM

How do I go about debating this
  • 0

Welcome to the learning society where children are subject to endless testing.


#2 NativeWarlock

NativeWarlock

    Top Speaker

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 656 posts
191
Excellent
  • Name:Alex
  • School:ENHS

Posted 16 February 2017 - 11:20 AM

Another good arg is antihumanism bad-

Ignoring the subject status of humans as unique obfuscates things like destruction of nature cause we are one with it- ie we wouldnt think twice about reking an animals food supply in favor of humanity cause there is no longer a semiotic divide- rainforests could die off to create beach houses for white elites. No hope for preservation

Also like antiblack violence is justified under their ontology- an example is Earth First!ers- who said we should release AIDs in africa for greater good- flat ontology erases those socio-political differences

Read Mikulak's article about natural sociality vs warfare cause they have a shit ton of impact turns against binaries bad

Edited by NativeWarlock, 16 February 2017 - 11:54 AM.

  • 0

#3 NickDB8

NickDB8

    Exodus Files Forum Representative

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 633 posts
385
Excellent
  • Name:Nick
  • School:Emporia HS

Posted 16 February 2017 - 11:44 AM

Another good arg is antihumanism bad-

Ignoring the subject status of humans as unique obfuscates things like destruction of nature cause we are one with it- ie we wouldnt think twice about reking an animals food supply in favor of humanity cause there is no longer a semiotic divide- rainforests could die off to create beach houses for white elites. No hope for preservation

Also like antiblack violence is justified- an example is Earth First!ers- who said we should release AIDs in africa for greater good- flat ontology erases those socio-political differences

Read Mikulak's article about natural sociality vs warfare cause they have a shit ton of impact turns against binaries bad

what the fuck did i just read


  • 3

Exodus Files - Updated 5/21! Grab our new STEM Affirmative for the upcoming education topic!

Research Tools


#4 NativeWarlock

NativeWarlock

    Top Speaker

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 656 posts
191
Excellent
  • Name:Alex
  • School:ENHS

Posted 16 February 2017 - 11:55 AM

what the fuck did i just read


Sorry mean under the 1ac's ontology oops
  • 3

#5 kylerbuckner

kylerbuckner

    novice

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,210 posts
1,158
Excellent
  • School:cabot

Posted 16 February 2017 - 04:34 PM

Another good arg is antihumanism bad-

Ignoring the subject status of humans as unique obfuscates things like destruction of nature cause we are one with it- ie we wouldnt think twice about reking an animals food supply in favor of humanity cause there is no longer a semiotic divide- rainforests could die off to create beach houses for white elites. No hope for preservation

Also like antiblack violence is justified under their ontology- an example is Earth First!ers- who said we should release AIDs in africa for greater good- flat ontology erases those socio-political differences

Read Mikulak's article about natural sociality vs warfare cause they have a shit ton of impact turns against binaries bad

anti-humanism is an explicit rejection of 'the human' as the focal point of politics.. seems like a pretty easy link turn to anthro.

 

also,flat ontology also doesn't seem like it has anything to do with gender nihilism.


  • 1

#6 NativeWarlock

NativeWarlock

    Top Speaker

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 656 posts
191
Excellent
  • Name:Alex
  • School:ENHS

Posted 16 February 2017 - 08:31 PM

anti-humanism is an explicit rejection of 'the human' as the focal point of politics.. seems like a pretty easy link turn to anthro.
 
also,flat ontology also doesn't seem like it has anything to do with gender nihilism.


I agree link turning anthro would be a reasonable arg, Mikulak is just an indict to abolishing that binary- on a truth level I think a flat ontology would resolve most impacts

And this specific gender nihilism aff makes demands of anti-humanism
  • 0

#7 sacrificialexcess

sacrificialexcess

    Junior-Varsity

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
-8
Slipping...
  • Name:Georges
  • School:École Nationale des Chartes

Posted 16 February 2017 - 09:33 PM

I think Preciado is quite the answer to such an aff
  • 0

#8 CoolioBrah

CoolioBrah

    Champion

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 112 posts
33
Good
  • Name:Pollo
  • School:AintNobodyGotTimefodat

Posted 17 February 2017 - 12:17 AM

this argues that we should rupture all binaries from gender categories. ie the man is no longer the man and the women in no longer the women but just objects like potatoes. then read a bunch of tricks that are like binaries bad


  • 0

#9 Nonegfiat

Nonegfiat

    Agambabe

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 649 posts
448
Excellent

Posted 17 February 2017 - 04:35 AM

this argues that we should rupture all binaries from gender categories. ie the man is no longer the man and the women in no longer the women but just objects like potatoes. then read a bunch of tricks that are like binaries bad



Gender nihilism or preciado?
  • 0

DOUBLE BIND- Either the harms of the aff are true and they can't solve until they control the levers of power OR the harms are constructed and you reject them for alarmism


#10 Ausar

Ausar

    Wulverine

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 155 posts
40
Good
  • Name:Jaws R. Blockah
  • School:Jefferson High School

Posted 17 February 2017 - 12:17 PM

heh them right wing lay judges be like "boy!"


  • 0





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users