Hi there. From a college that has very little debate support. Me and a partner are doing PF at a tournament autonomously. The only debate either of us have done is on policy-only HS teams. We were hoping to verify with an outside source (again, VERY shallow support network) about the way the debates are framed.
1. If a rez is worded as '[thing] should be banned in the U.S.'. Does that actually imply the USFG as an actor? If the rez was about, say, abortions, would Federalism be a legit con strategy?
2. Is FIAT a thing in PF? Does its use differ going from CX to PF?
3. If I were to construct and attach cases here on CX.com, is that something people would offer critiques on?
Thanks for any help anyone can provide.