I was wondering if anyone had contention ideas for the negation side of the current LD topic: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech. I'm currently running hate speech as my main argument(s), but I was wondering if there were better ideas out there? Thank you!
PM me for stuff if you want, I'm cool to trade. But my neg strat is
-Revenge Porn, like PailAmbrose says
-Funding, under Title IX universities have to ban harassing speech, even though it's protected under the FA, and not restricting that makes them lose federal funding.
-Hate Speech is good.
-Cyberbullying, FA applies to internet hate speech too
-Kant, seditious speech is protected, there are a bunch of issues with that, like the right to sedition means the right to destroy the state which justifies the annihilation of right
-International Law, that banned hate speech, human rights violations undermine ILaw, ILaw solves multiple extinction scenarios
I have some other stuff, but that's all I know off the top of my head.
As for court cases, look into Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. It was about student journalism, I use it for a court legitimacy/precedent DA.