Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'progressive'.
Found 3 results
To sum up my case really quick, It's a softer version of a K aff (to work better in traditional states/schools/ lay judges) revolving around repealing the one child policy. The plan text is literally just asking China to abolish the policy. Again, it's like half and half on traditional case and K Aff. The impacts and advantages are more K like. All I need to seal my last argument is that worldwide discourse (or just discourse itself) solves for all problems (or just that it solves generally). I've been digging through all the files my team has and I can't find anything that says it like that. I thought that maybe someone from a more progressive district could have more K type cards like that. Any help is appreciated
I live in a very traditional portion of West Texas where no one accepts progressive forms of debate. We run simple K's for "more progressive" judges and really explain them and impact them out but they never seems to get it. In fact, we lost a very important round because the judges didn't seem to understand a basic Cap K. How can we try to make it so judges understand what we're saying and maybe make our circuit more progressive?