Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'cross-x'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Debate
    • Help Me...
    • Novice Center
    • Culture
    • Other Forms of Debate
    • Virtual Debates and Online Videos
    • Workshops, Institutes, and Camps
  • Specific Arguments
    • Immigration
    • Disadvantages and Counterplans
    • Critiques
    • Theory and Framework
  • Evidence
    • Evazon
    • Evidence Trading
  • Community
    • Current Events
    • Thoughts and Ideas
    • Non-Debate Debates
    • World Culture
  • Regional
    • National Circuit
    • Pacific
    • Mountain
    • Southwest
    • Great Plains
    • Great Lakes
    • Northeast
    • Mid Atlantic
    • South
    • Kansas
    • Missouri
    • Texas
  • Respecting the Elders
    • College
    • Judging
    • Coaching
  • The Site
    • Feedback
    • Discuss the Articles
    • Main Page Polls
  • Archive
    • Topic Archive


  • Thursday Files
  • Affirmatives
  • Case Negatives
  • Counterplans
  • Critiques
  • Disadvantages
  • Impacts
  • Theory
  • Topicality
  • LD and Public Forum


There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.

Product Groups

There are no results to display.


  • Debate Resources
  • Coach Resources
  • Blogs
  • Videos
  • Tournaments & Results
  • Administrative Organizations

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start



Website URL


Google Chat/Jabber











Found 5 results

  1. I just can't seem to think of any CX questions to ask and I think Tournament 1 is soon :(
  2. How do we make this site better? Lets give us some ideas to push out to david and see... open to anything
  3. So in my state circuit, no one has ever run a K aff that is personal to them or is criticizing debate itself, and now there is. The K is lesbian separatism and they run it well, breaking at regional tournaments and tournaments like Dowling. One of our newer coaches on the team, who was a senior my novice year, says a good question to ask after a kritkal aff or a neg like feminism or lesbian separatism is "Would you be willing to concede the round in order to have a more meaningful discussion about _____?" I was wondering if this is a good idea as that if a team says no, my follow up is obviously "Why not?" when they inevitably say no and this exposes them as not actually trying to advance their movement but rather only trying to get a ballot. Also as a little bit of dislosure, I have only hit kritikal Juarez thrice and that lesbian case once and never saw a real K outside of cap until halfway through this, my sophomore, year.
  4. Was it down for anyone else, or just me? Why was this the case? I don't know where to put this so sorry if it is in the wrong forum.
  5. I've been worried about my upcoming part in a debate, specifically Cross-X. The topic in title is - Resvoled: In the United States criminal justice system, truth seeking ought to take precedence over attorney client privilege. We're the negative. I can honestly find no evidence that would be able to be used for us that suggests the right to counsel is flawed, and what I can find seems to be the ramblings of sovereign citizens thinking they've found out why every lawyer ever is a liar. I have no idea how to Cross-X for this kind of topic though, what kind of questions should I be asking, and what flaws should I be looking for in my opponent's constructive? Thanks guys (and gals)!
  • Create New...