Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'cp'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Debate
    • Help Me...
    • Novice Center
    • Culture
    • Other Forms of Debate
    • Virtual Debates and Online Videos
    • Workshops, Institutes, and Camps
  • Specific Arguments
    • Immigration
    • Disadvantages and Counterplans
    • Critiques
    • Theory and Framework
  • Evidence
    • Evazon
    • Evidence Trading
  • Community
    • Current Events
    • Thoughts and Ideas
    • Non-Debate Debates
    • World Culture
  • Regional
    • National Circuit
    • Pacific
    • Mountain
    • Southwest
    • Great Plains
    • Great Lakes
    • Northeast
    • Mid Atlantic
    • South
    • Kansas
    • Missouri
    • Texas
  • Respecting the Elders
    • College
    • Judging
    • Coaching
  • The Site
    • Feedback
    • Discuss the Articles
    • Main Page Polls
  • Archive
    • Topic Archive

Categories

  • Thursday Files
  • Affirmatives
  • Case Negatives
  • Counterplans
  • Critiques
  • Disadvantages
  • Impacts
  • Theory
  • Topicality
  • LD and Public Forum

Blogs

There are no results to display.

There are no results to display.

Product Groups

There are no results to display.

Categories

  • Debate Resources
  • Coach Resources
  • Blogs
  • Videos
  • Tournaments & Results
  • Administrative Organizations

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Website URL


Skype


Google Chat/Jabber


AIM


MSN


ICQ


Yahoo


Name


School


Biography


Location


Interests


Occupation

Found 28 results

  1. Hi me and my partner are starting to practice for next years CX topic, domestic survellience, and we have created a k aff for Queer Theory and in the practice round I will be negating and I need help finding k's, t's, Da's, etc. to run against it
  2. Hi me and my partner are starting to practice for next years CX topic, domestic survellience, and we have created a k aff for Queer Theory and in the practice round I will be negating and I need help finding k's, t's, Da's, etc. to run against it
  3. So me and my partner plan on running a discourse aff. How would we answer the Forum CP? (The counterplan advocates out of round discussion I think)
  4. I was interested in making a Deseg CP to answer Title 1/Econ affs with Dedev as the net benefit. What are your thoughts on that?
  5. What are the best ways to answer muti-plank CP's? I understand that they are abusive but what else should be included in a good 2AC block?
  6. Hi All, I have noticed that on some case negative files, there are CPs at the bottom. Some of these CPs, though, are not on openevidence. I recently faced a team which used these "hidden" CPs, and we did not know how to respond to the argument. (In fact, we did a bad perm without any warrants to not drop the argument). Is there a good way to search the internet/document where I can find all these "hidden" CPs just in case I run into a team who runs them in the future? Thanks, AmAsKh
  7. Hey all, when can we do an online tourney? I will start a bracket, PM me if you want to register. - Jake
  8. Long story short, I am trying to construct a basic NGO pic for the LD resolution: countries ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. I have most of it constructed, but I am struggling with the concrete argument of the competition: how is an NGO law/action SEPARATE from the country. Like, what I have in my head is that the NGO is the one actually prohibiting it, and the countries would just adhere/sign the treaty- and that the NGO is the one truly doing the action. Any thoughts?
  9. Hello y'all! If anyone wants to help me get a headstart on next year's topic, that would be great. PM me for more details, I have a ton of stuff to trade.
  10. I would like to run a DA and a CP combination in the future when I am off-packet. Do you have any recommendations on what DAs and CPs are good to run with each other? Thanks!
  11. So i was wondering if there is some sort of like CP that i could couple up with a policy FW against a K-aff claiming to solve for racism. Basically to show that a pragmatic policy approach is possible.
  12. DisBoiuLIfe

    Trade

    Hey, I'm looking for affs, CP's, or DA's, I'm not really into running fancy K's (*gasp*), but I do have a pretty big collection of weird K's, (Tao, Astropol, Buddhism , etc.) PM me if you are willing to trade.
  13. PowershotWu

    Ninja

    I'm writing a counteradvocacy to a pirates satire case a team beat us with. I can think of no better way of responding to pirates than by adopting a ninja mindset of exploration, but I'm really lost as to where I can find some good resources on ninjas. I'm not even sure if "ninja exploration" is a thing. Can anyone guide me as to where I could find some resources?
  14. WhatIsT

    "The" K

    So I recently stumbled upon a kritik about how the word "the" in front of "The USFG" is a violent act of Geopower and that is bad. It is in a file called 'the CP' and has counter plan answers in the file. So, my question is, would the cp plan text pretty much be restating the aff plan but without the word 'the' in front of 'USFG'? I know that the geopower k would be the net ben in this instance and I would presume that the solvency is the same as the aff.
  15. What should I read against the Taiwan affirmative, my school runs it, but I really want to know some good answers for it.
  16. Last weekend I went to my 2nd tournament. (First novice tournament, I went to my first tournament open). My partner and I got 3rd place. We won our first four rounds easily, but the 5th round was a little more difficult. To add on to our arguments, I decided to run a conditional counterplan. I explained to the judge and opposing team how a counterplan worked as did my partner at the beginning of every one of our speeches. (Long explanation first speech, couple sentences every speech after). I thought we had it in the bag. Then I shook the affirmative team's hand and went to go shake the hand of the judge. He said to me "This was my first time judging and I really didn't know what was going on." At that point my heart sank. We ended up losing the round. He put two reason on the ballot. a) Because in their last rebuttal, the aff team said that our counterplan wasn't a legitimate counterplan because it was nontopical and because of an argument about China (which was a new argument that they brought up in their last rebuttal). I really enjoy kritiks and counterplans. I have been told numerous times by my debate coach to never run a kritik in a novice tournament. She also told me if I ran a counterplan I would have to explain it in a way that would make sense to the judge. Basically, my question is this: Is there anyway I can run a kritik or counterplan at a novice tournament that would make sense to a lay judge? (College judges are a little different). Also, would a judge find it offensive if I asked them their paradigm or if they liked kritiks/counterplans? I ask this question because one of our teams at that tournament because a judge felt insulted by them.
  17. Hi All, I was wondering how it is possible to run multiple CPs/Ks. Wouldn't their alternatives contradict each other? If so, then can the affirmative team call the negative team out when they run multiple CPs or multiple Ks? Also, wouldn't running a single CP and a single K contradict each other as well? In the same way, how can an aff run multiple perms against a cp? Each perm would be saying something different, so wouldn't all the different perms contradict each other? Also, I was reading through a Kritik Conditionality file, and I was wondering what "Kritiks may involve two or more distinct worldviews" means. I'm not sure if I should run Kritik Conditionality or not. Thanks, AmAsKh
  18. I have a handwritten 1NC Shell, it would just be in case you ever get in a pinch.. It has a K I handwrote, w/ updated cards. I'm not sure what to call it but it's combinations of Dodds and Zizek. I have a CP, DA The DA is critical and has an impact of racism and the cp solves for it. There are a few answers to perm on the cp and an alt impact for the DA in the file. Its a total of about 45 pages. Pm for more detailed descriptions. Open for really anything trading wise. Just trying to expand all of my files. ***Also have a good file of zizek evidence
  19. I was interested in making a Deseg CP to answer Title 1/Econ affs with Dedev as the net benefit. What are your thoughts on that?
  20. I'm a first year LD debater, going to CLD/VLD in three weeks. CPs, Disads, and Ks, are to be expected at this tournament. We haven't learned how to write nor answer any of these. Not looking to write any currently but I have no clue how to answer them. Or what to expect with them. I'm really freaking out for this tournament.. Any help appreciated.
  21. Sorry for all my questions. Thanks so much for your answers to these posts -- they've been tremendously helpful. I've been reading a lot about realism and the threat-con K recently, and I'm realizing that I don't understand what makes a critique a critique. Here's my understanding of how a threat-con K typically works: A. Link: realism bad because you create enemies when you call them enemies (self-fulfilling prophecies). E.g. moving troops near a supposed adversary turns them into an adversary even if they previously weren't because they have to act defensively. B. Impact: everyone dies. C. Alternative: stop viewing countries as categorically "good" or "bad" -- remove "ally" and "enemy" labels. Here's what I don't get... How is that not just a disadvantage or a counterplan? Can't I achieve the same thing by saying: Disad: calling X country an enemy turns them into an enemy when they're actually not one, which links to everyone dying. I read the following in William Bennett's 1996 Rostrum article "An Introduction to the 'Kritik'": But how do you divorce assumptions and policy implications? In a K, we care about the assumption only because of its impact (isn't the format of a K supposed to be link/impact/alternative?)... so how can we say that a K is only about core assumptions? And by saying that a K doesn't assume the burdens of a DA, isn't that just trying to be lazy about writing what's actually a DA? Thanks in advance for clarifying. It's a big help.
  22. Before I post this counterplan I just wanna say this is my first one I have written, and I have almost 0 experience with any counterplans. I'm looking for What needs to be changed Will it work What should be added Any formatting changes maybe that list is pretty repetitive but yeah advice tips comments revisions is greatly appreciated thanks SUPER AWESOME COUNTERPLAN INTRODUCTION: Even though quantum physics is still full of surprises, researchers are using some of its concepts to create new technologies that can be used to better the world. That "fasten your seatbelt" light on airplanes may soon be a thing of the past, thanks to quantum turbulence experiments conducted by researchers in Brazil [source: American Institute of Physics]. As we've discussed, quantum cryptography can safeguard data on computers, while quantum computing will help those computers run faster [source: University of California - Santa Barbara]. An aspect of quantum physics called entanglement -- the quantum interconnection of atoms separated by distance -- may help make solar energy more accessible [source: American Institute of Physics]. Scientists have also discovered that algae may use quantum mechanics to store energy in two places at once, perhaps setting an example for how we can use quantum principles even if we don't understand them [source: University of Toronto]. The field of medicine, both traditional and alternative, offers many possibilities for the use of quantum physics concepts, from the identification of cancer cells to promoting r.(DONT READ THIS All above is direct quote from from DISCOVERY.COM) In the scientific community breakthroughs are made by applying theoretical ideas to real world problems and making solutions out of these problems.When we apply the quantum mechanics to our real world problems we open up a vast new field of opportunities that will forever leave a mark to its impacts on humanity. New ideas towards, medicine, computation, and multiple dimensions can be explored by looking at our oceans. Not only will problems currently going on in our world be solved but all problems can be solved in our world with the Multi World Theory or MWT PLAN The US Federal Government should take 20% of all congressmen ($174,000) and senators ($223,500) salaries which equates to 27,394,500 $. This money will be used to start the federal agency QPRD Quantum Physics research development This process goes through Fiat. 40% of all resources be used towards MWT(Multi world theory) Contention I : This research could help us gain more access to multiple dimensions which would ultimately end to all death and problems in the world A: “In 1954, a young student at Princeton University named Hugh Everett proposed a radical supposition that differed from the popular models of quantum mechanics. Everett did not believe that observation causes quantum matter to stop behaving in multiple forms Instead, he argued that observation of quantum matter creates a split in the universe. In other words, the universe makes copies of itself to account for all the possibilities and these duplicates will proceed independently. Every time a photon is measured, for instance, a scientist in one universe will analyze it in waveform and the same scientist in another universe will analyze it in particle form. Each of these universes offers a unique and independent reality that coexists with other parallel universes. If Everett’s Many-Worlds Theory (MWT) is true, it holds many ramifications that completely transform our perceptions on life. Any action that has more than one possible result produces a split in the universe. Thus, there are an infinite number of parallel universes and infinite copies of each person.” Universetoday.com Jason Chu B: “some version of that person in a parallel universe – has done or will do everything” “Moreover, the MWT implies that everybody is immortal. Old age will no longer be a surefire killer, as some alternate realities could be so scientifically and technologically advanced that they have developed an anti-aging medicine. If you do die in one world, another version of you in another world will survive.” Universetoday.com Jason Chu The study of Quantum Physics leads to more advancements towards MWT which can for example. stop the death of everyone in the world open up opportunities towards much more advanced technologies a world where the wrong decisions we have made does not exist In laymans terms the MWT theory can help us find a world where there is no death, and no more problems through the idea that there are infinite possibilities for any choice we make. We have the opportunity to fund something that can end any possible problem ever encountered by the human race through the theory that every choice ever made exists in a different reality. Contention II:Quantum Computing used towards our problems will result in advancements in the fields of medicine, data computation, and encryption. A:”quantum computing is “essentially harnessing and exploiting the amazing laws of quantum mechanics to process information.”” Quantum mechanics, in turn, encompasses the mechanics of the motion and interaction of subatomic particles.”A quantum computer is different from a traditional computer in the way that it processes information. A traditional computer uses strings of “bits,” which encode information in zeroes and ones. A quantum computer uses qubits, or quantum bits, units of a quantum system that encodes the zeroes and ones into two distinguishable quantum states. A qubit can represent a zero, a one, or both values simultaneously. But because qubits behave “quantumly,” it’s subject to quantum effects like superposition and entanglement.”Wallstreetcheatsheet.com Jess Bolluyt B: “Cryptography is a tool that enables the secure transmission of a secret message between a sender and a recipient from any potential eavesdropper. Traditionally the sender is called Alice, the recipient Bob, and the eavesdropper Eve. Quantum cryptography is a particular form of cryptography that relies on the laws of quantum mechanics in order to ensure unconditional security. Traditional forms of cryptography, which are of everyday use, either rely on a public key that everybody can access or on a private key.” “Public key cryptography is widely used for example by banks to perform secure money transfer, or over the Internet for securing websites access. The security of public key cryptography relies on the difficulty to realise an efficient algorithm to “crack” the communication. However these protocols are not unconditionally secure because no mathematical theorem forbids Eve to build a clever revolutionary algorithm, or a quantum computer, that will allow her to crack such codes. On the other hand, private key cryptography can be unconditionally secure if encryption techniques such as the ‘one time pad’ are performed. The weakness of these techniques is that the key has to be securely transmitted by Alice to Bob, whilst at the same time they are using cryptography because they cannot rely on their classical transmission channels.Quantum cryptography elegantly solves this dilemma by enabling the unconditionally secure transmission of a random binary key between Alice and Bob, and hence is very often referenced as Quantum Key Distribution (QKD). Basically, the security of the transmission is ensured by the no-cloning theorem that forbids the perfect reproduction, or cloning, of a quantum system without disturbing it, therefore enabling you to detect the presence of a potential eavesdropper. cqc2t.org Australian Government research council C: “Nuclear winter, but don’t count on that happening. In a 2009 paper for the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament, cybersecurity analyst Jason Fritz described how computer hackers could trigger a nuclear war. Hackers would infiltrate the detection systems of a nuclear state, he wrote, and fool its military into believing a nuclear strike was already underway. Officials would have 15 minutes, at most, to decide whether the alarm was genuine and how to respond. The hackers could create confusion during that brief period by shutting down communications systems with a denial-of-service attack—an event that would mimic the electrical disruptions that might occur if a nuclear weapon were to detonate in the atmosphere above the country. Ultimately, the panicked leaders might order a counterstrike, leading to an all-out nuclear war. Most cybersecurity experts regard this scenario as exceedingly far-fetched, though. There are too many encryption points, and too much human involvement, in nuclear launch systems for this to happen.” slate.com Brian Palmer D:”The human genome program is important because it uses information from DNA to develop new ways to treat, cure, or even prevent the thousands of diseases that afflict humankind.” Serend.brynmawr.edu “Computers are responsible for the DNA searching, alignment, and sequence reassembly; their involvement has greatly improved genome identification results in terms of speed, efficiency, and accuracy.In the realm of database searching, computers take scanned data and use one of the specified algorithms to search the target database for the query sequence. This is not as simple as it sounds, and was vital to the sequencing of the genome. BLAST, FastA, and Smith-Waterman are all examples of such algorithms.” cs.standford.edu There were 2,515,458 deaths in 2010 from disease in the US alone E: “Quantum computers use subtle physical behaviors of quantum mechanical systems for computing. Such computers may solve some problems, such as integer factoring, dramatically faster than conventional machines” demonstrations.wolfram.com Tad Hogg Quantum computation can lead to advancements in the research of cures for disease, advancements in our understanding of the human body, and medicine . Aswell as stopping a potential nuclear war through a new innovative unbreakable encryption method to stop hackers from causing nuclear wars among other things. F:Nuclear war can be prevented by this plan causing the huge impact of lives not ending “On the morning of 6 August 1945 an American B-29 bomber, the 'Enola Gay', dropped the first atomic bomb used in warfare on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The bomb was dropped by parachute and exploded 580m (1,900ft) above the ground. Between 60,000 and 80,000 people were killed instantly.” bbc.co.uk “A war using even a small percentage of the world's nuclear weapons threatens the lives of two billion people, a new report warns.” "The prospect of a decade of widespread hunger and intense social and economic instability in the world’s largest country has immense implications for the entire global community, as does the possibility that the huge declines in Chinese wheat production will be matched by similar declines in other wheat producing countries," commondreams.org Andrea Germanos, and ippnw.org Significance of whole plan: Our plan would stop nuclear war in the long term and short term, help create cures, and advance our knowledge of the human body and the way we think of medicine thus helping with curing diseases by using quantum computation and preventing disease and alignments of the body. There have been 50,451,402 deaths as of november 16 2014(worldmeter.info) All of these deaths could have possibly been stopped with the MWT if our plan was implemented earlier. Our plan will lead to the end of all problems and deaths in the long term with the Multi World Theory. The AFF does not have a large enough impact compared to ours for we have any problem they could possibly be solving for solved by our plan. They are only taking resources from the federal government that could be used towards our research and thus hindering the prevention of all deaths in our world. Made by Riley Mccarn
  23. My friend and I were arguing about if a counterplan needs to be competitive with the plan to win the debate IN THE EVENT OF NO PERM. This is assuming the cp has a net benefit and solves better than the plan. She believes that it's the neg's burden to prove that both the cp and the plan cannot be done together, otherwise the judge will just vote aff because there's no reason not to do both. I think it's judge intervention and that unless the aff makes a perm an uncompetitive cp with a net benefit will beat the plan. All answers appreciated.
  24. Hey Everyone I was wondering how one would frame a counterplan or counter advocacy as neg without reading a plan text in LD? My state is relatively new to LD and pretty traditional with limited policy terms in LD. I am a policy debater which makes that hard lol. So what would be the best way to read a CP without sounding too policy oriented? Thanks!
  25. Hello All, I'm planning to run the Linguistic Imperialism Kritik from UMich this year, and was wondering whether you could think of any CPs that are compatible with this kritik. The kritik can be found here: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnx1bWljaGRlYmF0ZXxneDo3Mjk3NGViNTkwMjQxOWQy If not, can anybody think of a good kritik-cp combination that works for this year? (I know that cap with an alt of historical materialism and any cp can be run, but I don't particularly like cap). Thanks, AmAsKh
×
×
  • Create New...