Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jimpeterson

  1. Also, Zizek identifies calculative pragmatism as something that characterizes capitalist subjectivity, which he is obviously in favor of subverting. This is one way to read his "Act" which entails a radical leap of faith away from capitalist subjectivity and a suspension of pragmatism.
  2. I run Heidegger, and run into the Nazi argument pretty frequently... A couple things we've had success with: 1. We can learn from Heidegger's mistake to ensure the alternative doesn't fall into the same problematic politics Heidegger succumbed to. This turns thier Nazi argument and allows you to garner extra solvency. 2. Point out that Heidegger's philosphy changed dramatically after his disillusionment with the Nazis, and your evidence is probably from the later period of his writing. 3. Zizek has a chapter in his new book (In Defense of Lost Causes) that characterizes Heidegger's Nazism as a "right step in the wrong direction". Cut it... 4. Hitler liked ice cream. The aff likes ice cream.The affirmative team are nazis.(This rests on the same ad hominem logic that the Nazi argument does) Make sure you make them articulate a direct link to Heidegger's philosophy, chances are they can't.
  3. If you want a very introductory book, I suggest "Routledge Critical Thinkers: Slavoj Zizek" by Tony Myers. This will give you the grounding you need to understand his books. when you get around to reading them. (I feel the best ones for debate are The Plague of Fantasies, or The Parallax View) I would disagree with previous posters and suggest you stay away from Lacan and the Political. Although its written by a Lacanian, it doesn't coincide with a lot of Zizek's work and probably won't help you learn him in the context of capitalism debates.
  4. That's not the point. Negation theory is just an argument defending the role of the neg is to prove the affirmative is bad. Negation theory doesn't necessarily defend the legitimacy of contradictory arguments,it just outlines the role of the ballot. While the thesis of negation theory is often used to justify perf-con, condi, etc, there is nothing intrinsic to negation theory that justifies these things.
  5. Agamben is always the best answer, because he assumes a very similar theoretical framework but draws different ontological conclusions. Be careful you don't link though.
  6. Sean, are you fucking kidding? Public Health!? When I read this, I started to sob violently.
  7. What's the thesis of the zizek ARV aff? Did a camp put it out?
  8. If you're going to run an aff like this, run something like mental colonization or Becoming the Other (Deluze). This SSA K is really weak and you're going to have a hard time winning that this is more important than a fair debate.
  9. sean I know this is random, but wtf is your avatar?
  10. This is the conclusion that I came to, and why I'm not cutting the aff. It might make a good K alt though..
  11. I can vouch that frey knows what hes talking about with this K... This is actually well answered by any post-modernism like foucault. Foucault would argue that we are all subjects of discourse, and only by interrogating these discursive forces can we gain autonomous identities. @sean "zizek for dummies" Actually, yeah. Zizek makes the argument that liberals make impossible demands on the system just to retain their position of intellectual purity and power.
  12. I cut a consult russia CP for last year's topic if you need any russia cards.
  13. He lost the boxing match, but won at life. Hal lost at both, but the message was that it didn't matter.
  14. haha wow conor. wouldn't that be strengthening his fantasy? if you guys are seriously so horny go watch porn. the ending in the movie was actually unique and not just another shitty Rocky ending.
  15. Dude I'm so pissed petrini left.. he had to go and sell pot to half the school. Who else will sack-tap remillard and get his shit thrown out the window by mr. deedy?
  16. "Listen up little novices - today we'll learn about the phallus"
  17. @ connor: That ending would have killed the Satrean message of the movie. The whole idea is that hal struggles to find some universal truth and order in his universe, but in the end he realizes that imposing order on his world is stupid. Thats why the ending is ultimately a "meh, fuck life"
  18. WTF!? The ending was the best part. It was an existentialist ending - there is no order in the random Other of love, but fuck it. Make your own truth. Your life is what you make it. I was glad it didn't cop out with the cliche ending of ginny and hal hooking up. How corny and predictable would that be?
  19. Badiou's criticism is commonly run in two ways: 1. Ethics - A good answer is any Derrida/Levinasian position you want to defend. 2. Identity politics - Zizek is the best answer to this. In The Parallax View he answers this when talking about human rights, sorry no page #. For generic answers Nicholas Brown writes an article called "Waiting for something to happen" Muse link
  20. I don't think that was very vague or directionless. As a libertarian, I think this is an important example of the wasteful and harmful excesses of government.
  21. I've read quite a bit from the Lacan / Zizek crowd but don't like the traditional Stavrakakis Utopian criticism. (Mainly because I don't think the kind of Utopian fantasies he is talking about are constructed in a debate round) Does anyone run Lacan in a way besides this?
  22. Yeah topicality will definitely be a problem. In regard to the accusations of terrorism, this probably stems from their anarchist sympathies. The FBI empirically likes to label anarchist groups "terrorists". I like the military funding idea, if I could win extra-topicality I'd have pretty good solvency for militarism solvency.
  23. Food not Bombs is a decentralized charity organization that takes unused wasted food from supermarkets and gives it to the hungry. The whole premise is that the money spent in one day on weapons could feed everyone in the world for a year. This is obviosuly fucked up. I was on their site the other day and found out that they have groups in africa. This case would be good for claiming an anti-capitalist/militarist/state advantage. Heard of anyone that has cut this? T would be a bitch, but it would be a fun aff.
  24. Rand also can be run as an objectivist kritik of forced charity, which could be run with compassion fatigue quite nicely.
  • Create New...