Jump to content

jimpeterson

Member
  • Content Count

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Okay

About jimpeterson

  • Rank
    Registered User
  • Birthday 02/03/1992

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=506622959
  • AIM
    jimpvx
  1. Also, Zizek identifies calculative pragmatism as something that characterizes capitalist subjectivity, which he is obviously in favor of subverting. This is one way to read his "Act" which entails a radical leap of faith away from capitalist subjectivity and a suspension of pragmatism.
  2. I run Heidegger, and run into the Nazi argument pretty frequently... A couple things we've had success with: 1. We can learn from Heidegger's mistake to ensure the alternative doesn't fall into the same problematic politics Heidegger succumbed to. This turns thier Nazi argument and allows you to garner extra solvency. 2. Point out that Heidegger's philosphy changed dramatically after his disillusionment with the Nazis, and your evidence is probably from the later period of his writing. 3. Zizek has a chapter in his new book (In Defense of Lost Causes) that characterizes Heidegger's Nazism as a "right step in the wrong direction". Cut it... 4. Hitler liked ice cream. The aff likes ice cream.The affirmative team are nazis.(This rests on the same ad hominem logic that the Nazi argument does) Make sure you make them articulate a direct link to Heidegger's philosophy, chances are they can't.
  3. If you want a very introductory book, I suggest "Routledge Critical Thinkers: Slavoj Zizek" by Tony Myers. This will give you the grounding you need to understand his books. when you get around to reading them. (I feel the best ones for debate are The Plague of Fantasies, or The Parallax View) I would disagree with previous posters and suggest you stay away from Lacan and the Political. Although its written by a Lacanian, it doesn't coincide with a lot of Zizek's work and probably won't help you learn him in the context of capitalism debates.
  4. That's not the point. Negation theory is just an argument defending the role of the neg is to prove the affirmative is bad. Negation theory doesn't necessarily defend the legitimacy of contradictory arguments,it just outlines the role of the ballot. While the thesis of negation theory is often used to justify perf-con, condi, etc, there is nothing intrinsic to negation theory that justifies these things.
  5. Agamben is always the best answer, because he assumes a very similar theoretical framework but draws different ontological conclusions. Be careful you don't link though.
  6. Sean, are you fucking kidding? Public Health!? When I read this, I started to sob violently.
  7. What's the thesis of the zizek ARV aff? Did a camp put it out?
  8. If you're going to run an aff like this, run something like mental colonization or Becoming the Other (Deluze). This SSA K is really weak and you're going to have a hard time winning that this is more important than a fair debate.
  9. sean I know this is random, but wtf is your avatar?
  10. This is the conclusion that I came to, and why I'm not cutting the aff. It might make a good K alt though..
  11. I can vouch that frey knows what hes talking about with this K... This is actually well answered by any post-modernism like foucault. Foucault would argue that we are all subjects of discourse, and only by interrogating these discursive forces can we gain autonomous identities. @sean "zizek for dummies" Actually, yeah. Zizek makes the argument that liberals make impossible demands on the system just to retain their position of intellectual purity and power.
  12. I cut a consult russia CP for last year's topic if you need any russia cards.
  13. He lost the boxing match, but won at life. Hal lost at both, but the message was that it didn't matter.
  14. haha wow conor. wouldn't that be strengthening his fantasy? if you guys are seriously so horny go watch porn. the ending in the movie was actually unique and not just another shitty Rocky ending.
  15. Dude I'm so pissed petrini left.. he had to go and sell pot to half the school. Who else will sack-tap remillard and get his shit thrown out the window by mr. deedy?
×
×
  • Create New...