StephenR

Ok thx

I ran into a CP (for a traditional aff, not a K one) where they just took a bunch of immigration experts and consulted them about the plan, it was pretty abusive there was no real net benefit, so it was easy to counter.

When u say continuous fiat is bad, do you mean it's bad to run a cp which relies on continuous fiat, or it's bad to argue, "continuous fiat bad"? Also for bureaucratic fiat, would an example of this be "We fiat Bernie Sanders and Obama endorse the plan" or something? Thx for your help.

stephenrolfes44@gmail.com

Thanks for the explanation. What about continuous fiat?

We lost a round because we couldn't respond to it. Also, I've heard that there are many kinds of fiat that can be argued, so if you could say some other types that would be awesome.