OwenK

dont post spam on this website.

Security K - Evazon.docxSecurity K - Evazon - Murray.doc Security K - Evazon.docx

its not terrible its just saying facts that stand alone (cards) are bad because they have no context

😂👍

I want honest opinions on all of these docs that are attached. They are intended to be read as poilcy cards and if u like them say so and feel free to take them! facts bad.docx white privilege K.docx bullying K.docx Rosa Parks.docx

argue that cont fiat is bad for db8... if theya are allowed to do this its round abuse. And yes Buracratic fiat is like fiating a DOJ decison or presidental approval.

its just an old philosophy just how some old school coaches do it

Reply with your email. HIGH-QUALITY POLICY DEBATE EVIDENCE ONLY!

While that's great David and all, we all (even more so you) need to make a decision, either openly say you want to sell the website or promote it. (This is the BEST policy website all over the web. People can get help when they need it and ask questions but the thing I would do is sell the site or improve it and get more users. I think that I speak for most of the active users on this site when I say this that we aren't forcing you to sell the site but either try to get it back to early 2000s levels or sell the site. I think the site can be improved by letting the active users have more of a moderating role... Also open it up to suggestions... see what the users want if you keep the site. We just want to maintain the best policy site on the web.

why dont you make more people mods?

Literally, if you have any sort of a competent judge continuous fiat is bad (fiat bad in general) because it just allows the aff to say fiat, fiat, fiat, fiat, so the arg there is its bad for db8 Also side note here is another really common type of fiat and how to answer it

1. anyone know why my posts need to be approved by a moderator and if/when they will 2. are there any active motderators on this site 3. How can I become a moderator

Ok here it is Durable Fiat Interp: The aff can fiat the action of the plan getting passed in Congress, but not that it is enforced by the current administration 1. Process DAs and Circumvention are key neg ground—unlimited durable fiat eliminates Politics DAs which hurts small schools that rely on generics and means we can’t test the political solvency of the aff 2. Most Real world—passed policies are revised to fit different needs, the aff needs to defend plan implementation, and since immigration is a highly politicized issue, fiating away political implications is unrealistic 3. Infinitely regressive—fiating away the implementation of the plan justifies fiating away any implications of the plan, allows them to no link out of all of our DAs Our interp isn’t abusive—the aff can still argue that the plan is popular or unpopular and that it won’t be rolled back