Jump to content

jmeza111401

Member
  • Content Count

    135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by jmeza111401

  1. Verbatim counts the highlighted words and tags only I believe
  2. Y'all need to chill k debate and policy debate are both good excluding either one is dangerous as both are highly important whether you be a person of privilege or not. Attacking each other on a debate forum is one of the saddest things I've ever seen go do hw, read a book, PREP, or etc. You will never be able to convince one an other if all you do is rapidly type away your opinion with an aggressive tone. with that being said just stop, stay hydrated, and have a nice day.
  3. The beauty of policy debate is that there can be a mix of both or even a mesh in both styles of debate saying that one style of debate is better or "meant for policy debate is kind of messed up. There are multiple examples of policy teams winnings against K teams and vice versa policy vs K debates are honestly one of my favorite debates to partake in and watch.
  4. It depends on the argument you are reading but check out this cool new website with FREE FILE I'm pretty sure you'll find something here: https://openev.debatecoaches.org/ This other website has helped me a lot too: https://scholar.google.com/ have fun prepping
  5. it will probably be up on openev in a few weeks
  6. First understand that fw say you need the usfg all you need is a reason why your advocacy should be and can't be done as a plan throught usfg for example if my advocacy is to affirm the queer immigrant identity then at fw would be something like the usfg cant affirm my identity immigration policy do x,y and z to queer immigrants and thats bad cus x,y,z affirming the queer immigrant identity is important cus x,y,z and just answer the standard and you'll be fine
  7. It depends on your specific aff
  8. Alright here the thread post the 1ac whenever you want.
  9. Vdebate anyone ? I really want to go neg I have some strats I want to try
  10. Cx: 1. Does the k solve for ableism or atleast helps solves for it ? 2. Will IDEA be around post alt? 3. Can solving for capitalism help solve for children with disabilities going to prison or dropping out? 4. What is society like post alt ? (I real dont have much more bring on the 1nr)
  11. Honestly that was as short as i was able to make it just do what you must in the block Edit: added smiley face
  12. here is the 2ac Can someone check the word count im open for cx 2ac v TheTrashDebater.docx
  13. paradigm: aff: do what you want for aff just make sure I understand why it is topical if its a k aff but besides that no prefs on aff K: Try to clarify any theory k's I have read a few but not a lot if I don't understand it I don't vote for it T/ theory: I love good T debates but I also hate bad T debate just trying to express why your interpretation is better also ( I will honestly vote for the fairest interpretation ) da/cp: they are alright you do you just explain the net benefit if there is no good net benefit then I have no reason to vote for the cp overall: be nice, have fun, and learn from this and a discussion after would be great edit: I used the wrong "your"
  14. also, can you give me a TVA for each of your interpts pls (this will be all for cx 2ac will be up probably tomorrow)
  15. cool here is some cx 1.first things first are all these off cases uncondo ? if not clarify the status of each pls 2. can you explain the link on the fed Da? 3. on the fifty states cp will IDEA still be around post cp ? 4. can you explain the Russell and Malhotra card? you didn't highlight and I want to see what you are trying to get at 5. on cap don't your cps promote state power too?
  16. Here's CX- 1. Why vote aff? the plan is a good idea 2. On Jackson, the card talks about health issues and concerns, how does the 1AC get access to that? the health issues is more of an example the main focus on the jackson should be the high risk/threat inequalities have 3. How does UDL have the ability to "dismantle the logic of disability? we don't affirm that UDL will dismantle the logic of disability but the inclusive design does help reach that goal 4. Does the 1AC repeal IDEA? yeah basically it removes and replaces IDEA 5. The long evidence indicates that it's the parents making the decision to send their kids into isolation, how does the 1AC overcome the mindset of the parents? well the parents are probably convinced by society that these special education classrooms are better for their kids when in reality they only have some benefits , while by implementing UDL they'll begin to see the benefits of inclusive design non segregated classrooms 6. One of Swenson's main warrants talks about ideas of building construction as a contributing factor to the segregation, does the 1AC change the construction of schools or does it just modify classroom curriculum? I mean special education and their padded rooms wont be used anymore but the 1ac mostly just implements UDL into the curriculum 7. Why is the supreme court key? the supreme court is key for the ruling portion of the plan and as said in our Linos et al evidence supreme court ruling can influence people's opinion 8. What does the 1AC determine what constitutes a disability? the 1ac mostly focuses on special education classrooms and the inequalities in them but we will argue that a disability can be anything society doesnt buy as normal for example in our Erevelles evidence African american and latino youth are represented as mentally imbalanced for having "aberrant bodies"
  17. Alright here is the 1ac im not sure on the word count but I think im okay. Open for cx 1ac udl.docx
  18. okay im out of school and have been doing some prep so I really want to do a pre-season immigration topic debate as neg so if anyone is interested (I will finish this one this time)
×
×
  • Create New...