-
Content Count
36 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
sfrpeterm last won the day on May 26 2018
sfrpeterm had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
20 GoodAbout sfrpeterm
-
Rank
Varsity
Profile Information
-
Name
Peter
-
School
SFR
Recent Profile Visitors
1581 profile views
-
So in the context of the aff, I got the impression that the courts would overrule Milliken and then assesses(?) where there is inequality and give some type of funding to get states to comply. I bet if I read the evidence more I would understand it better but that is just from reading all of the aff cards once and just going off of my flows. I am just not sure how you somehow deregulate federal power and then allow states to do stuff. This is where I think the T was really good here because I was under the assumption that the plantext was just to overrule milliken v bradley and then leave it up to the states, which doesn't seem like it would really give you much solvency for anything besides advantage 2. Also, you gotta explain some of the stuff you read on the K, especially BlackCrit. It could have made me love your perm and believe it, but I just didn't know how it functioned at all.
-
I'd cut this for next year's Baudrillard K At Home in Babel The Language of Hyperreality in the Immigrant Narrative.pdf
-
You just find a way to solve their impacts while avoiding some net ben to neitralize the adv. A good file for it is the michigan one: https://openev.debatecoaches.org/bin/download/2017/Michigan7/Advantage%20CPs%20%20-%20Michigan7%202017%20OW.docx
-
ODT R2: duhbait v Jw4167 / TheSnowball
sfrpeterm replied to Jw4167's topic in Virtual Debates and Online Videos
It has to do with being on a mac. For example, you can highlight a word on a mac using pages (I think), but it won't be readable on word in some cases. A quick solution is just to open the file in chrome and use that as a way to view the file. I saw all of the highlighting when I did that. -
ODT Round 1--TheSnowball [A] v jhirsch
sfrpeterm replied to TheSnowball's topic in Virtual Debates and Online Videos
I'll try to have the RFD up before midnight. Great debate, I really enjoyed the clash here. -
ODT Round 1--TheSnowball [A] v jhirsch
sfrpeterm replied to TheSnowball's topic in Virtual Debates and Online Videos
My paradigm should be on the original ODT thread, if you have any questions you can post or PM me -
I thought the 2NR was good, you could maybe have less of "this means a 100% neg ballot" and maybe more warrants? I dont think you had to close on all of those arguments, but the Rule V. Reg arg would have been good if I had warrant level extension. This point could have made earlier and would have been good for defending your brightline in the 2NR, which is "Courts is their own topic". I find that super pursuasive and you can come up with exaples such as "we have to prep a state courts CP and a hollow hope DA that ONLY works on courts affs". Besides that, solid work.