Jump to content

BiopowerRocks

Member
  • Content Count

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by BiopowerRocks

  1. Open Ev is where TF it's at, you probably already knew about that though. Honestly, your best option would be watching videos of high-level rounds on youtube other than that.
  2. Being soft left isn't that abnormal, you should definitely be prepared to see more of that. T, PIC's, Politics DA's, generic DA's, and pretty much every kritik will still link. On case you could have just run generic solvency takeouts and it would have been fine. No reason to concede in that round at all.
  3. what effect have the midterms had on policy affs?
  4. damn, ngl, that's pretty sadistic dude.
  5. I feel like you don't need another card for that argument, just use the ev you've already read.
  6. I guess the issue that you're running into then is that the Aff was cut very quickly from one source. There are other cards out there that do the trick and the magic wand of fiat lol
  7. What's the best way that I can download all of the Open Ev Files? I've seen downloaders from past years and I'm really sick of clicking links and waiting for the download
  8. There are lots of cards that talk about how S-Visas actually do provide LPR??? They should be in the CNDI files, I ran them a lot at camp. Limits is a standard so I'm not super sure how to help you there, if your C/i is that Visas are topical then just answer it by saying that visas still have functional limits, a lot of the Visas that they say would explode the topic are way to small to base an aff on, like one that allows inter-department transfers of employee for corporations.
  9. One issue you run into is that they could probably turn the hell out of your case, there's a lot of evidence that immigration actually Boosts the economy. Also you should focus on how the current system is capitalist. I would also recommend doing your own research about how current standards around Immigration replicate the harms you are looking for, I recognized a couple of cards and tags from this years open ev Lol.
  10. Prepare to get the living shit critiqued out of you.
  11. If they say that their paradigm is Stocks then remember the SHITS, Solvency, Harms, Inherency, Topicality, and Significance. You have to win all of those in order to get the round in front of most Stocks judges. If they say that their paradigm is Policy Maker then just prove that the Aff is an improvement over the SQUO.
  12. I guess that the question then becomes do they win the Ballot if they have really strong harms but weak Solvency.
  13. Right now I have some Theory stuff but that's about it, any help is needed and much appreciated.
  14. Anyone have Speech Docs? Really intersted in that framing
  15. The upload action is still broken, I'm still here and I tried every few hours I just couldn't get the 2AC file attached
  16. I'm having issues uploading, it keeps giving me an error box. I'll try again later tonight.
  17. Sorry it took me a little bit, I haven't been able to access the site. 2AC should be up soon
  18. I don't have the highlights and wordcount is not working. I'll begin cross anyways. 1. On the 1st Theory Do you actually have any way to prove that our Solvency warrants fail? Look at the cards in the advantages too. 2. On Vagueness theory How is the Aff vague? 3. On Vagueness theory Where is the briteline for vagueness? 4. On T ED- are there things other than actaully curriculum that affect the process of learning? 5. Do you actually read any evidence on the Courts CP 6. On the States CP- You just say "the counter plan competes with Net benefits and Topicality", I have two questions, first do you specify any Net Ben and can non-topical CP's be permed 7. Where is the impact or link to the Shell that talks about the Dollar 8. on the 2 for 1 DA- do you have any actual evidence of this executive order coming into effect? 9. On the midterms DA do you actually prove that the plan would be popular with Dems 10. On the Infrastructure DA do you have proof that Co-operation on Education spills over to Infrastrcuture 11. Do you have proof of Bipartisanship in the squo 12. On framework do you respond to any of my warrants on framework out of the 1AC 13. In your last card of Framework you say we are using framing as a rhetorical tool, what Ideological bent do you say the Affirmative has 14. Do you have a figure for Wordcount? 15. What is the Staus of the off-case
  19. I think this topic would be real interesting and explore a part of the USfg that people don't look at a whole lot, for instance your actor could end up being the Export Import bank, an Organization most Americans don't recognize. I also think that the India topic could be real interesting, specifically with the Indo-Pak nuke war impacts.
  20. I talked to Nick and it sounds like I can sub. Here's the 1AC
  21. I think that anyone can sub whenever, we just need to PM the organizer
×
×
  • Create New...