I'm know that I'm bad at debate, but I would really appreciate it if someone took the time to help me.
Ok so, I'm not quite sure how each the parts of a kritik function. I'm not talking about kritikal affs or nontopical ones, like I just mean the basic kritik. So for example if I wanted to run an anthro K, does the link prove that the AC is anthropocentric, or does it prove that the AC is doing something that leads to the impact which then proves that the AC is anthropocentric? Also, how would the framework function? If I did like, the ROJ was to endorse the debater that speaks the truth, does that mean my impacts had to all lead to what the truth is?
Sorry if there is something obvious I am missing here, I don't have much debate experience.
Also, I would appreciate if someone explained this simply to me, without using long loopy sentences that everyone here loves.