Jump to content

ronniesportman

Member
  • Content Count

    283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

ronniesportman last won the day on March 10

ronniesportman had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

39 Good

About ronniesportman

  • Rank
    Champion

Profile Information

  • Name
    Raunak

Recent Profile Visitors

2243 profile views
  1. Using fiat while ur actor is part of the executive branch.....
  2. EXTINCTION O/W!!!!!
  3. I mean if your just reading turns case - its no better than an alt cause on case. The existential threat gives you offense that is tougher for the aff to mitigate. If anything it gives a stronger nb to the Canada Cp and justifies sufficiency framing
  4. I mean not really - you just have to win framing flow if you go for a DA with existential impact.
  5. Pls direct me to where I can cut warren says paraontology <3
  6. Wait how so? Just paraontology/Inside outside stuff?
  7. I don't think hiring Lawyers is able to Solve, but rather saying smth like the plan streamlines the process that mitigates court clog. And how more applicants cause an increase in resource allocation to courts.
  8. yeah - it is untopical - Hiring judges/lawyers isn't removing a restriction on legal immigration.
  9. Why Do I feel like this is a trap/meme? *Edit* Just tried opening it - Broken link lol
  10. Yeah for sure - its raunakdua21@mittymonarch.com
  11. Well this seems to be a link to Idpol - A couple of things that I think can be added on from my previous post. First is like a Victim Blaming argument, anytime we are faced violence and we try to speak out we are blamed for our own struggles. We are told to not embrace our identities because we cause capitalism/more violence against us when in reality embracing our identity is a form of survival strategies for us. Then do some kind of cap link turn about the use of identity politics/narratives - There are a bunch of good ones. But it depends on the type of scholarship you use
  12. Ummm which arg in specific - there are a bunch of args that talks about commodification but not in like the context ur explaining it....
  13. I mean I got that but like do you have the ev that they read or the contextualizations to the aff. Because my go to response would be proved that even if cap commodifies stuff Durable Fiat means plan gets implemented fully without any changes means the aff creates material good and a structure of law that is able to help said group. The K situates itself in an ivory tower to reject material change that allows for the ongoing violence of said group while the Aff is a pre-requisite to their impacts because of XYZ. Why does it get traded to be sold to companies for catch - phrases. Like you never see types of policies on t-shirts etc. rather its these anti-capitalism movements and supposedly radical movements that get commodified and sold like - Antifa, Karl Marx t-shirts, IhateCapitalism, etc. But even if you don't buy that how does the aff get sold to companies, like if we help a certain group of people then even if certain ideologies get sold to companies those are good and create a more benevolent form of capitalism. But Idk - Thats the best I got without a clearer understanding of the way the arg worked in round
×
×
  • Create New...