I will go ahead and throw my name in the pool, if there's any other questions regarding my paradigms, feel free to PM me.
tl:dr : mostly tab, but kritikal arguments need to be explained well and I will default to policy-maker if the round isn't framed for me
Tech > truth, unless the arguments are blatantly racist/some other -ism
Speed: Normally I put something here, but I feel like this won't be relevant to a v-debate.
K-Affs: Gonna be honest here, not something I have much experience with. That being said, I am perfectly fine with them, just be aware you may need to do a little bit more work to justify running something like this with me.
Ks: I have more experience with these, but I am not well versed with the lit. Just give me good 2nc/1nr overviews explaining what the k means in laymen's terms and your good.
T: I will vote on T, but please don't run T against blatantly topical policy affs. That makes me sad.
Theory: I will vote on it, but it needs to be well justified. Blippy theory purely there to waste time makes me sad.
Framework: As I don't have much experience with K-Affs, I don't have much experience with this either. Once again, that being said, I will vote on this if it's well justified. Speaking from my limited knowledge however, I much prefer an argument that actually engages the aff.
CP/DAs: Probably what I have the most experience with, I love these and will vote on them along with good impact calc.
Case: If you can prove why any part of the aff is false/not a good idea, I will vote neg on presumption, so just keep that in mind