Jump to content

imasterdebatetobaudrillard

Member
  • Content Count

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by imasterdebatetobaudrillard

  1. I'm running neolib with a moral rejection alt and 1 or 2 disads. does the alt need to solve for the disads?
  2. i mean the title explains it all. i've never ran dedev before and only had it run on me once in a class troll practice round so idk how to shell it out-- i was thinking collapse inevitable, collapse now key, growth bad ???
  3. ur current plan text sounds FX T since ur solvency is predicated off of US-NK trade not US-Ch engagement directly u might also get hit with vagueness theory since it's not clear how exactly you "use China's influence over NoKo" i think it's a good aff but tweak the plan text so it's more qpq like TheSnowball suggested, also prep tf out for T
  4. Suh dudes, I need a solid alt for the neolib k for this year's topic. Something that falls in line with a discourse first FW but isn't just "reject the aff" (which is what I've been running this season. i'd say we win on the K about 80% of the time, but we almost always kick the alt and go for the links as solvency deficits/inevitability claims/disads to their methodology). I've heard historical materialism or universalism are pretty solid?? @ my fellow k hacks, help
  5. Suh dudes, I need a solid alt for the neolib k for this year's topic. Something that falls in line with a discourse first FW but isn't just "reject the aff" (which is what I've been running this season. i'd say we win on the K about 80% of the time, but we almost always kick the alt and go for the links as solvency deficits/inevitability claims/disads to their methodology). I've heard historical materialism or universalism are pretty solid?? @ my fellow k hacks, help
×
×
  • Create New...