Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Crispy last won the day on December 7 2018

Crispy had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

21 Good

About Crispy

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Name
    Christopher E
  • School
    South East

Recent Profile Visitors

3168 profile views
  1. Just wanted some thoughts. For critical aff teams, what if they made their own resolution. In thinking of this idea I would presume that their resolution would allow them to be topical and give other debaters a heads up about the arguments justified under this new wording.
  2. For 2NRs on T, I usually go for a overview and then impact analysis. This is where I spend at least 2-3 minutes fleshing out the importance of fairness and education within the debate community with some DAs to their interp. Afterwards, I'll just answer to any line-by-line they put up, and that's when I just use the answers from the blocks.
  3. My recommendation would be to find a card talking about how X group immigrants are being targeted through some mechanism within the immigration system and slap on a restriction to it. However, for set col aff's its a bit trickier. So you might want to find an immigration policy now that's hurting natives [maybe ask the aff team in round what policy is displacing natives and then they'll give you one.] Slap on that good ol' USFG should restrict and there you go.
  4. For me, I usually structure it like any T shell really [Interp, Violation, Standards, and then Impacts]. For TVA, I have that as just offense and read that at the end of the speech. I'm probably not the best Framework hack here so I bet someone else has a better structure, but that structure continues to win me K rounds.
  5. Crispy

    Impacting T

    I know the two main impacts are Education and Fairness, but how do you go more in depth with it. Just curious lol
  6. I didn't do a word count, but it's not too long. If you have a problem then just message me and I'll fix it. Critical SLP V7.docx
  7. Kinda down for a debate on either side for the education topic so DM me lol
  8. I feel like there may be some research in the instance of making a topical aff. Maybe something with certain security measures being implemented as a solvency mechanism. Maybe an anti-bullying discourse being implemented (in the instance of the past shooting then probably tailor it with mental health standards so that students can point out those who may pose a threat to the school).
  9. Does anyone know how to get a Free PDF version of "a thousand plateaus."
  10. Crispy

    All my Files Now Free

    How much is the Digital Debate Camp???
  11. For me, winning the framework as AFF against the K allows the affirmative to weigh the impacts of the 1AC, Ik they previously said it. Some explanation: Bc you win FW, that means the judge has to take into consideration your Impact, and lets say you go ham completely on Impact Calc and prove why yours outweighs, then it makes it easier for the judge to vote AFF. I do believe that winning FW shouldn't be your only argument, like they said earlier, getting into the substance of the K such as No Links, Impact Turns... etc should be good as well.
  • Create New...