Jump to content

PailAmbrose

Member
  • Content Count

    320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    12

Everything posted by PailAmbrose

  1. they even let you reverse your upvotes. How will cross-x go on without “sorry for accidental downvote” posts
  2. Alright, sorry for keeping everyone waiting for so long, I've been a bit busy and (admittedly) put it off too long. Here's the RFD. I can answer questions, because I'm sure people have them RFD.docx
  3. I very much agree with this, which is why I’m having a hard time writing an RFD. Apologies for taking so long, but I am working on it
  4. I’m out of the country so my timezone is weird, but my preferences are on the original odt thread. A condensed version: - Tech over truth - For policy, I prefer less off with more warrants and am fine with cheating CPs that have an advocate - For Ks, explanation > buzzwords and the link debate is most important. I need extra explanation for Bataille, Baudrillard, and Cybernetics args since I’m not super familiar - Flowing hurts my hand and I’m not great at it, so try to make lbl as easy as possible for me
  5. 1AR word count is 1659, order is case, engagement K, cap. Sorry for taking so long! 1AR trashdebater.docx
  6. What are the warrants to Wilkie and how does it link to the aff? Can you explain your response to the link turns? After that I’m good for 1NR
  7. Sorry for the delay. 2AC word count is 2879, you can have an extra 100 words in the block or if that's too far over I can cut down some more. Order is case, off in 1NC order. Open for CX 2AC trashdebater.docx
  8. Sorry for the delay, here’s CX Status of the off? 1 What is “engaging in politics” per the interp? What are some examples of affs that meet your interp? What’s the warrant in the Brown evidence for the ballot being bad? Is the “ballot bad” stuff distinct from the interp (like if you kick the interp can you still go for ballot bad?) 2 What’s the difference between the second and third off? What does “a radical form of civic engagement” look like? 4 How is this off competitive? Sounds silly, but is the CP fiated? 5 What’s the link to the Torrant evidence? What is an “organization” and why is the state the only one that can solve? I get that prison labor may incentive incarceration, but what’s the warrant for cap structuring all criminalization? What makes the alt’s civic engagement distinct from the civic engagement of the 2nd off? Just that it’s for a communist purpose? What guarantees that the political party formed by the alt is actually successful? Case What’s the warrant to McWhorter? Maybe follow ups
  9. Prepare your framework blocks. Word count's in the doc (I assume we're keeping the ODT word limits), open for CX Abolition v2.docx
  10. Eh I'm not really in it anymore so I don't really think it would be fair to make this round count for the ODT. You should probably just get a win for your opponent not showing up and then this can be for fun
  11. I can be aff if you want, although I don't have policy blocks for this topic so it'll probably be a K round. If you're cool with that then I can post a 1AC whenever
  12. Not really debating in the ODT anymore, but if you want to debate this round for fun/practice and Peyton doesn't show up I can pick this round up
  13. The lack of blocks is making this difficult lol. The 2NC order is just the K, there'll be an overview of the impacts and then it's straight down in 2AC order. Word count is 2852, I'll take 100 words out of the 1NR if that's okay, if not I can adjust. Quick CW since this does make references to sexual assault and suicide, but they're brief and not in-depth depictions. Open for CX *EDIT: Also for the record, since I'm slower than I should be, you can definitely have any extra time you need for the 1AR 2NC ZidaoWang.docx
  14. I haven't flowed this round so take this with a grain of salt, but I don't think these two Ks are necessarily a perfcon. I think you need to more clearly back up the "the Ks operate on two different levels" claim because I think it's definitely true, but the analysis just isn't there. I think a better strategy would be to frame the Ks as "Public education is probably bad, but IF they prove it's good then it's a question of what type of education we should prioritize, in which case the fem K is better pedagogy because..." because that clearly shows that you're testing on two levels and would allow you to make a pretty good we meet claim, if that makes sense.
  15. Alright I don't think I'll be able to get the 2NC done by 9, but I will definitely have it done tonight, if that's okay
  16. Sorry for the delay, I thought it would be no CX but I actually do have one question: Can you explain the Graham evidence and how the K links to it?
  17. Honestly this is the most traffic this website has gotten in years
×
×
  • Create New...