Jump to content

Theprorules

Member
  • Content Count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Theprorules

  • Rank
    Novice

Profile Information

  • Name
    Parker
  • School
    PCDS
  1. LDers here and I was just kinda curious why no one takes RVIs seriously in cx. RVIs are like the norm in LD. Doesn't it make sense that if you call someone a cheater and you're wrong you should lose the round just like false accusations of clipping would lose you the round? It seems unfair to introduce an unreciprocal burden into the round (i.e. T) where the negative can win on either T or substance while aff has to win both. Only thing I have ever heard CXers say is that aff shouldn't win because they are fair but this a. has no impact to fairness/education b. is false because the aff isnt asking to win because they are topical but because the neg unfairly accused them of being untopical. Just curious why does everyone hate RVIs?
×
×
  • Create New...