Leadership How does any of your US-China impact ev account for talks last month between Obama and Xi? It doesn’t. Yours talk about how there will be social co-op (to deal with social problems), and mine talk about military impacts, so mine doesn’t account for your talks cause yours aren’t pertinent. "At the same time, a stable and predictable China-U.S. relationship will most likely ensure a less uncertain match-up during the power transition in the United States. The Beijing Summit helped ease tension in the Asian Pacific Region." "With pronounced tensions over a China-Japan confrontation, maritime disputes, and a reinforced U.S.-led alliance network; the Asian Pacific Region has seen a larger increase in military budgets and arms races than other regions. The Asia-Pacific Region is where China and the United States interact the most. Therefore, the two countries’ reaffirmation of cooperative rather than conflicting policies helped ease some of these tensions." - our card. How does that not discuss such issues?
"Kashmir is a challenge that the United States can neither avoid nor resolve. India has the power to rebuff unwelcome U.S. involvement" - that's from your Perkovich 10 card. So doesn't that show that 1) India doesn't want Murcan involvement 2) India can reject Murcan involvement and 3) Murca can't solve Kashmir disputes...
For 1) and 2), its not showing that they don’t want involvement or will reject it, but that if it’s too much, then they can tell us to back off and we will listen (meaning no conflict between us). For 3) they can’t go in there and physically stop it, but they can use leadership to repair foreign relations.
That still agrees with 2) tho, right?
Plastics Where is the warrant in the BISE card? And being cited by the EU doesn't count. It talks about invasive species found in Europe, and the effects seen from them. "About 10 000 alien species have been registered in Europe. Some of these species were introduced on purpose and remain economically important. However, a proportion of the alien species established cause significant damage to native biodiversity…" - BISE. Doesn't that support that some alien species are good, and only a proportion of the species are damaging? Also, where does it even say that there are any negative effects seen in Europe. On Mmom 8, why can't I find the original article for this on the internet? The link's broken. Could you show me the actual article?
Your Baronsky et al 11 card says "there are clear indications that losing species now in the 'critically endangered' category would propel the world to a state of mass extinction," so how does this account for species that aren't critically endangered? I mean, this card doesn’t necessarily, but how do we know that some of the species lost aren’t endangered? I mean if we have species loss and there are tons of endangered ocean creatures then I mean… You say, "how do we know that some of the species lost aren’t endangered?", but a better question is "how do we know that some of the species lost are critically endangered?" (Note both "are" and "critically") Anyways, only 16 critically endangered species exist, 4 of which are marine species. Two of them are whales (dolphins are whales), and you claim whales aren't important. So by your logic, the loss of two turtle species (that are already decimated) will cause mass extinction? Source: https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/directory?direction=desc&sort=extinction_status
Lol you say that "overfishing is hyped up by eco-scientists" but in your Denoon 6 card you say that "The cause: the disappearance of species due to overfishing, pollution, habitat loss, and climate change," when referring to the "apocalypse of 2048." Contradiction much?
No because my card accounts for the combination of all effects not just overfishing. Okay whatever, but Denoon 6 says overfishing is important to the cause of the deaths/extinctions of fish species, correct?
Where does the Walker 14 card say that biodiversity loss causes food insecurity?
Thanks to biod loss, we are doing thing unsustainably now and we must commit to saving BioD to save health
Quotes from the card, please?
Where is the warrant in the Brown 9 card?
“For many years I have studied… trends and their interactions. The combined effects of those trends and the political tensions they generate point to the breakdown of governments and societies. Yet I, too, have resisted the idea that food shortages could bring down not only individual governments but also our global civilization. I can no longer ignore that risk” so studies.
Brown says "Yet I, too, have resisted the idea that food shortages could bring down not only individual governments but also our global civilization. I can no longer ignore that risk." - doesn't that show that it's only a risk?
Also, does "Eh" mean you concede no warrant (for the other cards)?