Jump to content

NickDB8

Member
  • Content Count

    808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    43

Everything posted by NickDB8

  1. All the plan wants to clean is plastic, not metals or things of the such. In my version of the Aff, we don't make extinction claims. The CP doesn't solve for the plastic in the oceans that's already there. And on the Wilson and Martini and Goldstein evidence, you can use it, but I'm just saying, you're probably not going to win in THOSE CARDS because Slat directly answered their issues. When it comes to K's, I legitimately am a novice. I'm not even sure how to answer those yet lol.
  2. I forgot the million. 240 million. Plus the 4.3 million in up keep yearly. There was a second study released last month addressing all of M&Gs issues.
  3. I'm actually running this, and any other team running it should have sufficient answers to all of these. T- Oceans, there are five gyres across all oceans T- Substantial, it actually costs 240$ dollars T- Development, just explain how "resource extraction" is extremely over limiting. Sinking trash? Slat says 80 percent floats. And on the K's, call me a novice, but isn't removing plastic-that's killing thousands of animals- a good thing? Land based CP- do both, there's no competitiveness nor Net Benefit, plus, if you merely stop the flow, there's still the plastic that's already there and needs to be picked up. Don't even bother with Wilson or Goldstein and Martini evidence, Wilson has no credentials and Slat answers all three of the authors in his Feasibility Studies.
×
×
  • Create New...