Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


1961 last won the day on October 17 2015

1961 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

42 Good

About 1961

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Name
    ethan goode
  • School
    Barbers Hill

Recent Profile Visitors

3792 profile views
  1. PM If you have a large imperialism back file, or imperialism K links to this years resolution. I am willing to trade quite a bit of evidence.
  2. Here you go! Judith Halberstam-The Queer Art of Failure-Duke University Press (2011).pdf
  3. This oddly doesn't show up on the front page? edit: nvm xD
  4. Does anyone now of any recordings of rounds where the 2nr went for a bataille k?
  5. 1961

    Cross-x Discord

    I created a discord for debaters to utilize. It is brand new, so if you have any recommendations there is a section in the discord for those. For anyone who doesn't know what discord is, "Discord is a free voice and text chat app designed specifically for gaming". If anyone needs to know where to get discord here is a link https://discordapp.com/download Here is the link for the discord server once you get in: https://discord.gg/R6J8bgY
  6. 1961


    Rather than having a skype we should set up a discord. From personal experience it is easier to use when you want to create a communication hub for a large number of people.
  7. I think the dumping aff DebateJedi is talking about is specific to e waste trade, which is the trade of used electronics for recycling purposes. I have seen some pretty good environmental justice evidence talking about how the e-waste trade facilitated by the United States endangers communities by introducing carcinogens, and lead to water sources and agricultural products. I am not sure how you could connect that to indigenous dumping impacts, but you could definitely find a link to some environmental justice impacts.
  8. Policy affirmative's which try to solve over for kritikal impacts can be strategic, because it means that you dodge out of quite a few da's, gain access to some kritikal impacts without having to debate policy framework, and you have better leverage to control questions of impact framing. The downside is that often times debates will boil down to issues of solvency, so if there isn't solid solvency for solving over your impact it might be a better idea to go for a straight k aff.
  9. 1961

    Cap Lit?

    In a traditional German toilet, the hole into which shit disappears after we flush is right at the front, so that shit is first laid out for us to sniff and inspect for traces of illness. In the typical French toilet, on the contrary, the hole is at the back, i.e. shit is supposed to disappear as quickly as possible. Finally, the American (Anglo-Saxon) toilet presents a synthesis, a mediation between these opposites: the toilet basin is full of water, so that the shit floats in it, visible, but not to be inspected. [...] It is clear that none of these versions can be accounted for in purely utilitarian terms: each involves a certain ideological perception of how the subject should relate to excrement. Hegel was among the first to see in the geographical triad of Germany, France and England an expression of three different existential attitudes: reflective thoroughness (German), revolutionary hastiness (French), utilitarian pragmatism (English). In political terms, this triad can be read as German conservatism, French revolutionary radicalism and English liberalism. [...] The point about toilets is that they enable us not only to discern this triad in the most intimate domain, but also to identify its underlying mechanism in the three different attitudes towards excremental excess: an ambiguous contemplative fascination; a wish to get rid of it as fast as possible; a pragmatic decision to treat it as ordinary and dispose of it in an appropriate way. It is easy for an academic at a round table to claim that we live in a post-ideological universe, but the moment he visits the lavatory after the heated discussion, he is again knee-deep in ideology. ~ Zizek on pooping Edit: Here is an interview on Zizek's perspective of authoritarian capitalism that exists in China( ) this could be a pretty cool starting place, and offers a complexity to the discussion.In all seriousness though, Zizek is a pretty good author. Most of the authors I read are all over the place, but here is some pretty lit alt evidence if you are looking for going down a traditional marxist economic kritik: Tumino ‘1 Stephen Tumino, professor of English at the University of Pittsburgh, “What is Orthodox Marxism and Why it Matters Now More Than Ever Before,” Red Critique, Spring 2001, http://redcritique.org/spring2001/whatisorthodoxmarxism.htm Any effective political theory will have to do at least two things: it will have to offer an integrated understanding of social practices and, based on such an interrelated knowledge, offer a guideline for praxis. My main argument here is that among all contesting social theories now, only Orthodox Marxism has been able to produce an integrated knowledge of the existing social totality and provide lines of praxis that will lead to building a society free from necessity. But first I must clarify what I mean by Orthodox Marxism. Like all other modes and forms of political theory, the very theoretical identity of Orthodox Marxism is itself contested—not just from non-and anti-Marxists who question the very "real" (by which they mean the "practical" as under free-market criteria) existence of any kind of Marxism now but, perhaps more tellingly, from within the Marxist tradition itself. I will, therefore, first say what I regard to be the distinguishing marks of Orthodox Marxism and then outline a short polemical map of contestation over Orthodox Marxism within the Marxist theories now. I will end by arguing for its effectivity in bringing about a new society based not on human rights but on freedom from necessity. I will argue that to know contemporary society—and to be able to act on such knowledge—one has to first of all know what makes the existing social totality. I will argue that the dominant social totality is based on inequality—not just inequality of power but inequality of economic access (which then determines access to health care, education, housing, diet, transportation, . . . ). This systematic inequality cannot be explained by gender, race, sexuality, disability, ethnicity, or nationality. These are all secondary contradictions and are all determined by the fundamental contradiction of capitalism which is inscribed in the relation of capital and labor. All modes of Marxism now explain social inequalities primarily on the basis of these secondary contradictions and in doing so—and this is my main argument—legitimate capitalism. Why? Because such arguments authorize capitalism without gender, race, discrimination and thus accept economic inequality as an integral part of human societies. They accept a sunny capitalism—a capitalism beyond capitalism. Such a society, based on cultural equality but economic inequality, has always been the not-so-hidden agenda of the bourgeois left—whether it has been called "new left," "postmarxism," or "radical democracy." This is, by the way, the main reason for its popularity in the culture industry—from the academy (Jameson, Harvey, Haraway, Butler,. . . ) to daily politics (Michael Harrington, Ralph Nader, Jesse Jackson,. . . ) to. . . . For all, capitalism is here to stay and the best that can be done is to make its cruelties more tolerable, more humane. This humanization (not eradication) of capitalism is the sole goal of ALL contemporary lefts (marxism, feminism, anti-racism, queeries, . . . ). Such an understanding of social inequality is based on the fundamental understanding that the source of wealth is human knowledge and not human labor. That is, wealth is produced by the human mind and is thus free from the actual objective conditions that shape the historical relations of labor and capital. Only Orthodox Marxism recognizes the historicity of labor and its primacy as the source of all human wealth. In this paper I argue that any emancipatory theory has to be founded on recognition of the priority of Marx's labor theory of value and not repeat the technological determinism of corporate theory ("knowledge work") that masquerades as social theory. Finally, it is only Orthodox Marxism that recognizes the inevitability and also the necessity of communism—the necessity, that is, of a society in which "from each according to their ability to each according to their needs" (Marx) is the rule. tbh I am interested in seeing how cap k debates unfold next year, specifically surrounding the alt debate, considering China has already tried its hand at Marxism and essentially failed. I guess that means I can't run my "most historically responsible" framework anymore xD.
  10. I don't have a list, but I know that a lot of states still have policy debate. States I have personally seen debaters from include Texas, Kansas, Florida, California, Illinois, Minnesota, and Michigan.
  11. Does anyone have access to these two articles? http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vger20 A Realism of Protest: Christoph Schlingensief's Television Experiments And http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rprs20 Christoph Schlingensief and the Bad Spectacle
  • Create New...