pigasus

*tries to make joke about how my state is really right and people might be ok with it* *remembers that my state is where the aryan brotherhood is from and that people are ok with it* *dies*

The only way to win T is to not run it in the first place.

My partner is the goat. He always helps when we steal the ballot.

Wanna do a Vdebate?

This made my day omg. I heard that if you buy four of their CDs, they can make a secret message when stacked in a cube.

Ok here's a little game I'm playing at the next tournament. We're debating old school. No spreading, no cards, no extinction impacts, no advantages, just a well written and simple speech on a topical government action. Thoughts? Ideas for how to make this more interesting? How do you think people will react?

This is your best argument. I would read this, framework, and a cissexism k.

fuck. i always spell it like that. I need to work on that.

Too much. Too many. We don't. I still love it though for some reason.

as a bi person who wrote a large part of that aff, I approve of you running the aff. It's not about being queer, it's about fighting against the oppression of queer people. Also, queer theorists today use the concept of queer to describe other oppressed peoples such as POC, womyn, and the disabled. Read the Mary Nardini Gang evidence about totality. They use the term totality to describe systems of oppression as a whole. This totality attacks queers, immigrants, the economically disadvantaged, every oppressed group. Even though you aren't specifically queer, you can fight back against this broader totality. One of the other authors calls this a matrix of domination I think (I dont want to go find the evidence). That being said, don't pretend to be queer and don't pretend to fully understand the queer struggle. Understand that life for queers is fundamentally different than life for straits because of the heteronormativity and cissexism in the world, and that queer theory and the queer struggle is shaped by that way of viewing the world.

so it goes

good luck, Deleuze and Guattari usually couldn't explain what their words meant.

Well, in that case...

I'm surprised to see this thread in the right forum, but i'm curious. what is this argument like?

dont know what i was expecting. this is how this kind of stuff goes.