Jump to content

hmhm

Member
  • Content Count

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

22 Good

About hmhm

  • Rank
    Junior-Varsity
  1. hmhm

    Poetry Bad

    poetry is bad it is co-opted and used it is also bad
  2. Quebec secession results in nuclear war. New World Order Intelligence, May 2006 (http://www.survivalistskills.com/quebec.htm) Lamont's forecasts, based upon all of this input? Canada will disintegrate shortly after Quebec separates via a Unilateral Declaration of Independence [bouchard threatened to do this on April 28th, 1996]. Quebec will become a socialist, somewhat aberrant and unpredictable state which will ultimately be refused entry to NAFTA by the US and Canada. The Canadian provinces will seize more and more power from a weakened Federal government, become individual or regional "mini-states" themselves, and turn their eyes southward. BC and Alberta will withdraw into "Cascadia", a union of those two provinces with California, Oregon, Washington State, Idaho and Alaska, forming a bloc with the ninth-largest economy in the world. BC and Alberta will apply for admission into the US, and be accepted immediately. Manitoba will hook up with Minnesota around a Red River union. Saskatchewan will join with Montana, Colorado, and Wyoming in the Rocky Mountain Corridor. Manitoba and Saskatchewan would be given associate status with the US, depending - among other things - on how cooperative they are in facilitating the export of Canadian water to the United States. Ontario would sink into the embrace of the US Great Lakes states. Canada's Atlantic Provinces would form an "association" with New England. The US federal government, Lamont asserts, will not be "happy" with this turn of events - it will complicate security and defense arrangements, multiply the difficulties in observing and fulfilling a wide range of current bi-lateral agreements and treaties, etc. But it will be "persuaded" by the addition of vast water resources, wood, immense mineral troves, multi-billion barrel oil and tar-sand reserves, etc, to America's economic base and strategic reserves. The Russians, who have always regarded Canada as a less-belligerent "buffer" across the Arctic between the U.S. and themselves become increasingly resentful of Canada's absorbtion into a Continental Union. The hardline communist/nationalist faction having triumphed in Moscow, they begin armed "probing" flights across the Arctic divide in an attempt to test out the effectiveness of the NORAD radar early-warning system after Quebec's separation and Canada's slow collapse. Feeling even more threatened by the growing American colossus, the Russians become even more aggressive and "trigger happy". The same treaties that reduced US/USSR missile forces permitted the Russians to increase their terrain-hugging bomber-launched cruise-missile stockpiles, and they take full advantage of this. Canada, the "international diplomatic buffer", has ceased to exist. And, that ensures Canadian fragmentation that removes the best buffer between the U.S. and Russia—causing nuclear warLamont ‘94-President of American Trust for the British Library-1994 (Lansing, “Breakup: The Coming End of Canada and the Stakes for America†, p. 237-9) Economic Reform has collapsed throughout Russia. Widespread despair over soaring prices, injured pride over Russia’s loss of stature, and disgust with Moscow’s leadership boil over. A cabal of so-called “Reds†and “Browns†–unreconstructed former communist officials and neo-Facist militants- sweeps the Yeltsin reformers from office. In the name of restoring social order and adverting total economic ruin, the leaders of the coup establish an authoritarian provisional government backed by key elements of the disaffected military. The new government resents the Western for its Cold War triumph and humiliation of the Soviet Union, resents the infatuation with Western culture and consumer products. It especially resents the United States for having won the arms race and reduced Russia to a beggar nation, then acting niggardly in its response to Russian requests for massive economic aid. The Russians who have always regarded Canada as a less vehemently anti-Soviet bal­ance against the United States in the continental partnership, particularly resent Canada's fracturing after Quebec's separation and the prospect of its pieces eventually attaching to the U.S. empire. Russian-North American relations move from- tepid-to subfreezing. The new hardliners running the Kremlin reassess Russia's arsenal of Bear and Blackjack long-range bombers, its nearly 1,200 air-launchable cruise missiles. They reanalyze the strategic value of the Arctic, whose jigsawed desert of ice conceals not only an estimated 500 billion barrels of oil but lurking nuclear-armed submarines. Then, the Russians order a sequence of air­borne reconnaissance missions to hard-probe the Arctic and North Amer­ican defenses. Somewhere on the eastern end of the Beaufort Sea, 30,000 feet above the approaching Parry Islands, a Russian Bear-H intercontinental bomber prepares to enter North American airspace clandestinely. The turboprop bomber, a bright red star on its side, has averaged 400 miles per hour since it left its base in Siberia and headed over the polar icecap. It carries inside its bulky frame eight AS-X-15 cruise missiles, each a little over 20 feet long, each packing a nuclear warhead with more than five times the power of the Hiroshima bomb. As it wings over Canadian territory, high enough so that air resistance is minimal, the Bear approxi­mates the flight mode of a glider, moving silently through the ether except for short irregular bursts of acceleration from its engines. The bomber is some 200 miles off Canada 's Arctic coast when the ultrasensitive radars of the North Warning System's CAM-M site at Cambridge Bay pick it up.
  3. hmhm

    K Affs

    Heg good K, Cede the political DA and framework Making great K debates since the dawn of time.
  4. Science diplomacy solves the internal link to every major impact– resolves issues related to warming, resource shortages, economies and public health Federoff ‘8 (Nina Federoff, Penn State professor and Obama secretary of state science and technology adviser, April 2 8. “TESTIMONY BEFORE THE HOUSE SCIENCE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND SCIENCE EDUCATION†http://gop.science.house.gov/Media/Hearings/research08/April2/fedoroff.pdf) The welfare and stability of countries and regions in many parts of the globe require a concerted effort by the developed world to address the causal factors that render countries fragile and cause states to fail. Countries that are unable to defend their people against starvation, or fail to provide economic opportunity, are susceptible to extremist ideologies, autocratic rule, and abuses of human rights. As well, the world faces common threats, among them climate change, energy and water shortages, public health emergencies, environmental degradation, poverty, food insecurity, and religious extremism. These threats can undermine the national security of the United States, both directly and indirectly. Many are blind to political boundaries, becoming regional or global threats. The United States has no monopoly on knowledge in a globalizing world and the scientific challenges facing humankind are enormous. Addressing these common challenges demands common solutions and necessitates scientific cooperation, common standards, and common goals. We must increasingly harness the power of American ingenuity in science and technology through strong partnerships with the science community in both academia and the private sector, in the U.S. and abroad among our allies, to advance U.S. interests in foreign policy. There are also important challenges to the ability of states to supply their populations with sufficient food. The still-growing human population, rising affluence in emerging economies, and other factors have combined to create unprecedented pressures on global prices of staples such as edible oils and grains. Encouraging and promoting the use of contemporary molecular techniques in crop improvement is an essential goal for US science diplomacy. Science Diplomacy is effective, it ensures global cooperationTurekian and Wang No Date Cited [Vaughan Turekian, Chief International Officer of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and Tom Wang, Director of International Cooperatoin for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, “Building an International Network of Knowledgeâ€] In the decades since the depths of the Cold War, scientists and engineers in the United States and Russia have built a special bond. As relations between their governments have shifted from acute tension to the thaw of détente to friendship and back to mutual wariness, our researchers have worked side-by-side on a range of successful projects. This cooperation has been critical in building and enhancing relationships that, while outside of the political realm, have helped to promote understanding and trust among the our people. And the relationships produced important science in fields ranging from physics, health, and space exploration to the development of Internet-based information-sharing networks and the control of nuclear proliferation. Today, the world is a vastly different place than it was 40 years ago, or even 10 years ago. Though tensions remain among countries, we no longer struggle with the strong polarization of national philosophies that characterized the Cold War. At the same time, common issues confront us on a global scale. The current financial crisis, international terrorism, the changing climate, and competition over energy supplies all show how interrelated we are. National leaders are ever more aware of the reality that solving these and other challenges will require the innovative power of science, engineering and technology. Russia’s leaders understand that, and U.S. President Barack Obama does, too. These developments suggest that science diplomacy is entering an important new era, and that, if it is employed to help nations share knowledge and seek common solutions, it can be a powerful force of prosperity and peace. Science diplomacy is not a new concept between Russia and the United States. During the Cold War, despite the geopolitical deadlock between the Soviet Union and the United States, the two powers used scientific exchanges to initiate a thaw. The relationships that grew from those first tentative agreements have since produced vast knowledge, billions of dollars in economic activity and real improvement in human well-being. At a time of financial crisis and renewed geopolitical tension, there is an inclination to pull back from such cooperation. Indeed, there is an unspoken sense among some U.S. policymakers that science cooperation is a one-way street, a form of aid dispensed or withheld to achieve our own national ends. But this view is short-sighted. Two years ago, the United States and Russia renewed an ambitious science-cooperation agreement; the U.S. Department of State cited a range of valuable accomplishments by the nations’ researchers. A 2002 RAND report prepared for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy concluded that the joint efforts provided great benefits to the United States. U.S. scientists cite many cases in which Russian colleagues have shared valuable knowledge: Treating radioactive coolants; Using soil and climate data to understand climate change; Developing new treatments for bone cancer. These past examples show the potential of continuing cooperation. We have broad areas of common interest: Fundamental research in nuclear physics; fusion energy research; counter-terrorism; nanotechnology; the control of infectious disease; arctic science; and development of clean energy sources. The Russia-U.S. relationship has tended to be bilateral, but as the world grows more interconnected, this will have to evolve. Nations on every continent are investing in science and research capacity: South Korea and China have been transformed, seemingly overnight, by investing in innovation. Cuba has become a world leader in biomedical research. Rwanda is wiring itself for the Internet, and has begun to distribute thousands of computers to its young students. Argentina, as it develops its capacity in biotechnology and nanotechnology, is building cooperative science relationships not just in Latin America, but with Europe, Africa and the Arab world. However different these nations are, each recognizes that science and technology will be the currency of the future; investments today will pay off in economic growth and societal development tomorrow. It is in this context that international science cooperation provides the opportunity to build bridges between countries, both through governments and through civil society relationships. To be most effective, such an approach needs commitment from all interested parties—not just scientists and engineers, but policy-makers, the foreign policy community, educators and the public. This emerging reality inspired the American Association for the Advancement of Science to establish a Center for Science Diplomacy earlier this year. In October, the Center convened intensive meetings with top U.S. leaders from foreign policy, business, education and science to discuss the best ways to pursue international partnerships, even with nations such as North Korea and Cuba, where governmental relationships have been profoundly strained. Still, an overarching challenge confronts us now: At a time of financial crisis, we must work together to address world problems in a way that contributes to sustainable, long-term economic growth. Governments play an important role in such partnerships, but they cannot succeed without the commitment of individual researchers in Russia, the United States, and many other countries. If scientists and engineers take leadership, we can pursue new discoveries and solutions to shared problems even as we build understanding and trust between our nations.
  5. Sorry about that again. It'd be great if you could update this considering that I couldn't get to my computer for a few hours.
  6. I ran a Natives aff this year, and have plenty on Native discourse accumulated. Just message me a list of files you can trade (preferably k stuff).
×
×
  • Create New...