Kritikal affs don't translate to kritiking everything.
If you want to you can kritik arguments, however it isn't the most strategic option in my opinion.
First on T: You can either choose to defend your plan as topical, kritik Topicality, or you can redefine debate as something other than topical discussions, meaning you say "debate isn't just read a dictionary and you lose, it is about actually learning about the topic and our affirmative does that best, not to mention our interp of debate is best for actually learning, topic education, other voters..."
I personally advocate redefining debate, because it makes sense and will most likely be the best way to defend your plan.
DAs: You don't have to kritik these either, and I wouldn't recommend it because if you examine this, it gives the neg a great example of abuse(ex: spending DA....you say "spending disad? pssh noob i don't answer you spending is dumb" , or at least that is how it will be framed in terms of an abuse debate). You can also straight up debate the disad, however this probably won't fit in with your advocacy style, again I would recommend a different approach--it really depends on how you defend your aff--such as defending your aff as an affirmation of an ethic or idea, as opposed to defending the implementation of your plan(theory and T will be big here). If you want to defend the actual implementation of your plan, it is best to actually answer the disad directly.
Ks aren't the only argument to address kritikal affirmatives: Any argument can apply to kritikal affirmatives(it's not like kritikal affirmatives create a force-field), actually kritikal affs open the door to bigger T and theory debates than usual, and still have links for disads, counterplans, and Ks.
Kritikal affs aren't around because they dodge arguments, they are a mode of framing debate in a different light and and transforming the structure of the case. Don't run one just because you think it gives you a "I don't link" card, run it if you research it, believe it in(optional but very helpful), and understand your defense of it.
*If you want a personal opinion it would be better to hear the aff you had in mind?
Sorry if I sound like a douche, I wasn't trying to be rude, South Park just has me so pissed....
