Oh hi again. Can I judge?
Ts - Make the abuse story make sense/at least explain it, for the neg. For the aff, why there is no abuse. Pretty simple. I don't lean anywhere for anything, btw.
CPs - Simple, have a net benefit that is likely to happen if I vote aff. I don't vote on .0001% chance of the NB happening, but anything decent should be fine, aff needs to prove why it won't happen, if they outweigh etc. Oh, of course it's a plus if it solves case, but I figure that's a given. Both of these are, actually, lol
Ks - Love em, make them make sense is pretty much it. I hope you understand your own kritik, haha.
DAs - The most basic things ever, just why the impact outweighs, why the DA links, simple. Don't have to explain these as much as kritiks, but if the warrants are in question then there you go.
Theory - I don't default anywhere, once again just explain abuse for the neg and why there is no abuse for the aff.
Basically, I don't give any judge intervention. When I say I love kritiks I just find them fun, haha.