Jump to content

Ajax

Member
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

21 Good

About Ajax

  • Rank
    Registered User
  • Birthday 09/04/1980
  1. yeah my bad.. i think there were like 2 or 3 files that still hadnt been uploaded yet so i didnt want to zip them all together.
  2. WDW- Kansas State http://www.savefile.com/projects/808679123
  3. Ajax

    Fantasy Nationals 2008

    It has started... your pick was a while ago. Go check the thread entitled Fantasy Nationals the Draft
  4. I dont know if you noticed.. but mr. cook is from kansas as well and had quite a bit of success here. I recomend you listen to his advice.
  5. This is my personal favorite CARD IN 2K3 [Claudia, prof of philosophy (Ph.D from Harvard), Senior-Fellow at the Institute for Research in the Humanities, “Genocide and Social Death,” Hypatia, vol. 18, no. 1, Winter] Genocide is not simply unjust (although it certainly is unjust); it is also evil. It characteristically includes the one-sided killing of defenseless civilians— babies, children, the elderly, the sick, the disabled, and the injured of both genders along with their usually female caretakers—simply on the basis of their national, religious, ethnic, or other political identity. It targets people on the basis of who they are rather than on the basis of what they have done, what they might do, even what they are capable of doing. (One commentator says genocide kills people on the basis of what they are, not even who they are). Genocide is a paradigm of what Israeli philosopher Avishai Margalit (1996) calls "indecent" in that it not only destroys victims but first humiliates them by deliberately inflicting an "utter loss of freedom and control over one's vital interests" (115). Vital interests can be transgenerational and thus survive one's death. Before death, genocide victims are ordinarily deprived of control over vital transgenerational interests and more immediate vital interests. They may be literally stripped naked, robbed of their last possessions, lied to about the most vital matters, witness to the murder of family, friends, and neighbors, made to participate in their own murder, and if female, they are likely to be also violated sexually. Victims of genocide are commonly killed with no regard for lingering suffering or exposure. They, and their corpses, are routinely treated with utter disrespect. These historical facts, not simply mass murder, account for much of the moral opprobrium attaching to the concept of genocide. Yet such atrocities, it may be argued, are already war crimes, if conducted during wartime, and they can otherwise or also be prosecuted as crimes against humanity. Why, then, add the specific crime of genocide? What, if anything, is not already captured by laws that prohibit such things as the rape, enslavement, torture, forced deportation, and the degradation of individuals? Is any ethically distinct harm done to members of the targeted group that would not have been done had they been targeted simply as individuals rather than because of their group membership? This is the question that I find central in arguing that genocide is not simply reducible to mass death, to any of the other war crimes, or to the crimes against humanity just enumerated. I believe the answer is affirmative: the harm is ethically distinct, although on the question of whether it is worse, I wish only to question the assumption that it is not. Specific to genocide is the harm inflicted on its victims' social vitality. It is not just that one's group membership is the occasion for harms that are definable independently of one's identity as a member of the group. When a group with its own cultural identity is destroyed, its survivors lose their cultural heritage and may even lose their intergenerational connections. To use Orlando Patterson's terminology, in that event, they may become "socially dead" and their descendants "natally alienated," no longer able to pass along and build upon the traditions, cultural developments (including languages), and projects of earlier generations (1982, 5–9). The harm of social death is not necessarily less extreme than that of physical death. Social death can even aggravate physical death by making it indecent, removing all respectful and caring ritual, social connections, and social contexts that are capable of making dying bearable and even of making one's death meaningful. In my view, the special evil of genocide lies in its infliction of not just physical death (when it does that) but social death, producing a consequent meaninglessness of one's life and even of its termination.
  6. Actually to prove your point more so KC has 6 with 2 more being easy to travel to those being Waru as well as topeka high, but yeah that is definitely irksome.
  7. http://www.mediafire.com/?bydmlwzdm9o Scientist that talks about both nature caused Global Warming and also how empirically global warming has had good impacts
  8. http://www.scribd.com/doc/8817/Renewable-Energy?ga_related_doc=1 Though I can't think your going to want to use much of it since it is more than 10 years old. There is a k or 2 in there, and some disads that might still apply if you update the unikness.
  9. Ajax

    Worst Bands

    http://www.thewebshite.net/nickelback.htm More proof that Nickelback is indeed the worst band of all time.
  10. Ajax

    CEDA Nationals 2008

    If the round started at 8 like planned wouldn't we have a result by now?
  11. Ajax

    CEDA Nationals 2008

    Any word on Dartmouth KO vs. KU JS
  12. What is the date of the tournament?
  13. You say multiple disads and other arguments, but I'm pretty sure that the affirmative has the reciprocal of that with multiple advantages. Only if the neg runs more than one counterplan could you use the argument "if the neg can do it why can't the aff". Which with a hypotester isn't unheard of.
  14. I am willing to work on this project also, hit me up on gmail.
×
×
  • Create New...