Jump to content

db8rules

Member
  • Content Count

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Okay

About db8rules

  • Rank
    Registered User
  • Birthday 04/27/1990
  1. How do I find a good partner at camp? How do they even assign partners? The last camp I went to I just partnered up with my actual high school partner, so I'm not quite sure... I really really really need to find a good partner at camp this summer b/c how well I do at the camp tournament essentially determines the rest of my debate career b/c it determines if I debate with this brilliant debater on my team. I plan to work my butt off at camp and work really really hard for the tournament, but how do I find a partner who is a) as good, and as dedicated? Thanks
  2. but if we argue (a) that any ethical person is rational, and won't act if their action gets the other killed and ( there's no internal link to in round discourse, and if we realize that someone else has to take the ethical action we solve just as well for the adv is deferring it to someone else necessarily bad? i mean, the other person is still ethical...
  3. but if we argue (a) that any ethical person is rational, and won't act if their action gets the other killed and ( there's no internal link to in round discourse, and if we realize that someone else has to take the ethical action we solve just as well for the adv is deferring it to someone else necessarily bad? i mean, the other person is still ethical...
  4. util good makes sense, but how do we answer calculation bad?
  5. what? we don't solve our obligation to the other b/c we have another country do it, that makes sense... the US doesn't solve for ethics, but since there's no IL in the round to the US doing it, it doesn't matter... as long as my partner and I who are running the agent CP realize that something needs to be done, ergo we solve for the infinite responsibility?
  6. Idea: To answer the Levinas/Ethics advantage (infinite responsibility to the other, need to help other first, k2 value of life), etc etc... in a world where it's just 1 adv: levinas I don't think there's any internal link to in-round solvency, so can't you just run an agent CP and subsume all offense? How would you answer calculations bad/calculations devalue your responsibility, kills value to life, allows ppl to be commensurable? IMO: any rational ethical person (in the US) will still calculate, b/c if their action triggers XYZ net benefits to the CP, then the US person would prefer someone from the EU (example) to do plan b/c saves lives? What would be better ways to articulate this?
  7. Idea: To answer the Levinas/Ethics advantage (infinite responsibility to the other, need to help other first, k2 value of life), etc etc... in a world where it's just 1 adv: levinas I don't think there's any internal link to in-round solvency, so can't you just run an agent CP and subsume all offense? How would you answer calculations bad/calculations devalue your responsibility, kills value to life, allows ppl to be commensurable? IMO: any rational ethical person (in the US) will still calculate, b/c if their action triggers XYZ net benefits to the CP, then the US person would prefer someone from the EU (example) to do plan b/c saves lives? What would be better ways to articulate this?
  8. Idea: To answer the Levinas/Ethics advantage (infinite responsibility to the other, need to help other first, k2 value of life), etc etc... in a world where it's just 1 adv: levinas I don't think there's any internal link to in-round solvency, so can't you just run an agent CP and subsume all offense? How would you answer calculations bad/calculations devalue your responsibility, kills value to life, allows ppl to be commensurable? IMO: any rational ethical person (in the US) will still calculate, b/c if their action triggers XYZ net benefits to the CP, then the US person would prefer someone from the EU (example) to do plan b/c saves lives? What would be better ways to articulate this?
  9. We run DADT opp team: T gay's aren't "people" needless to say we won PS. things that are needless to say may not be needed to say.
  10. OMG i'm such an idiot I checked out that book from the library the "showdown" one but didn't think to look at the review, which says EXACTLY what I need it to say thanks a billion
  11. China kinda has nukes now. I was more hoping for some author who says ............. the US has the capability of defeating China in a war now, but in X years from now, when China's missile defense systems/weaponry/technology has developed more, A. US can't win or B. HUGE casualties
  12. Where can I find authors who say A. US-China war inevitable B. US can win a war with China now C. US will lose a war with China in the future Thanks.
  13. db8rules

    China-US War

    Where can I find an author who says that A. US-China war inevitable B. US can win a war with China now C. US will lose a war with China in the future Thanks.
  14. Anybody have any visual imaging good cards (willing to trade) have any good authors? to be more specific, any like video-clips good? Just to garner offense. Thanks
  15. Anybody have any visual imaging good cards (willing to trade) have any good authors? to be more specific, any like video-clips good? Just to garner offense. Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...