Jump to content

stealthytitsMcGee

Member
  • Content Count

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stealthytitsMcGee

  1. no one ever argued that, we're talking about yankton vs. the watertown teams mentioned above
  2. didn't this team lose to a shitty watertown team in round two and then get butt fucked by another watertown team in the final round?
  3. Does a counterplan have to be mutually exclusive? Can it just compete through net benefits or is this considered 'artificially competitive'? If a negative ran a counterplan and the affrimative's only arguments were: A perm. A theory argument saying the counterplan must be mutually exclusive and if it is not there is no reason to vote on it. Would you look at the counterplan when voting? Recently a South Dakota team lost to the argument above; could the three ballots be a regional thing? Or, was the round a complete judgefuck?
  4. Was that suppose to be irony or are you just dumb?
  5. Watertown will be sending the following policy teams: Varsity: VanLaeken-Ohara Otto-Dirose Timm-Peterson Junior Varisty: Weber-Titze Ulrich-Farber Culhane-Loof Carter-Mohling
  6. This thread will be kept updated (hopefully stickyed eventually) and will have listed all South Dakotan Varsity and Junior Varisty teams and their cases. Obviously, not all of you will be willing to disclose your own case, so I'm asking everyone to post the teams they have hit and that team's case. It will benefit every school equally and increase the quality of debate by having better prepped arguments. Let the posting begin!
  7. Who's All Going To Camp, If So, Which One? Post About Any Camp You And/Or Your Teammates Are Going To.
  8. Nice one on the spelling comment, it didn't quite live up to my legendary 'too' kritik. But seriously and honest to god this isn't JVL, and I'm gonna laugh my ass off tomorrow when you start drilling him, he says its not him and starts laughing, and then you 'know' it's him and convince everyone to just be mean to him the rest of the day, the poor kid.
  9. 1) I see your grammatical context you're agruing for and does make sense; however my context does also. I posted: "I'm thinking you maybe should have used one of your other seven accounts to make that post- that way it would make people think you actually had friends." Notice that the term 'should have' this indicates we are talking in the past tense. Since I was talking in the past tense, the phrase, "you actually had friends" means that you 'had' friends at the time of your post. I could have used either 'had' or 'have', than again it doesn't make one damned bit of difference so just shut the hell up about it. 2) Yeah you totally just killed me, oh wait, I'm not JVL. . . Yeah now you just seem pretty dumb, go die.
  10. Yeah, I kinda already already destroyed you on that other thread so I'll lay off a little now.
  11. Actually I have taken a shower today, it was rather refreshing. Yeah and I used the word 'had' on account of the fact that I was talking about a post that happened in the past tense; see sometimes words change during tenses, it's not too complicated of a process. I also wanted to compliment you on that post; you really got me on that one. It was so awesome, like you pointed out a grammatical error, that like wasn't even an error; you are a king at this shit.
  12. Yeah, I'm sorry that account definitely doesn't belong you dirose, big apologies on my side, I'm sure everyone else believes this too. Who am I?- I'd rather not reveal my personal name in order to prevent identity theft; you should never ask someone on the internet for their name, it violates their privacy dickweed. Plus if you haven't figured out who I am by now you obviously are just proving your idioticness. As for Foucault, yeah I know a lot people read his shit, but most people don't run his K nearly every tournament, talk about biopower non-stop, and put a quote by him in their facebook profile. And no, I really don't want to put my cock in your face. ps- when you said "if you are going to cock me" you pretty much revealed that you are indeed politx_da
  13. I'm thinking you maybe should have used one of your other seven accounts to make that post- that way it would make people think you actually had friends.
  14. seriously shut da fuck up Dirose, stop starting fights, neither one of you know if the other sucks at debate, chances are you both suck at an close to equal level which is pretty sucky. unless you wanna hook up a debate with him don't comment on other people's abilities ps- reading foucault doesn't make you a god at debate and yeah, you're the douche bag
  15. i think you're a damned hippie that lights up a little too often
  16. 1) Try using google, see it's a search engine in which you type the subject you want to know about and you than find websites meeting your query. 2) Humans haven't had a good effect on enviroment, it's pretty obvious. 3) Global warming IS caused by human actions, read Kerry's or Gore's new books. 4) It is not a good thing, read the books. 5) If these cards did exist they'd be extremely uncredible. 6) You'd be a complete dumbass running of these arguments. 7) Judges would never vote on these arguments and they might consider murdering you for running them. 8) Slap yourself for being so damned retarded.
  17. jfeist does rather blantantly pwn all, but you should be quiet dirose- your starting to piss me off
  18. Who's all going and who's trying to qual?
  19. me and johnson are going to dominate that tournament
×
×
  • Create New...