Jump to content

yeahitsme

Member
  • Content Count

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About yeahitsme

  • Rank
    Longtime Member
  • Birthday 12/17/1988
  1. did they also put out a neg for this case?
  2. wow i've never seen dex so pasionate about something
  3. i think at that point if no one cares then theres no problem. I realize that kind of philophospy can open unwanted doors but on this minor scale i think it holds true. I really don't think seperating the girls and the guys on gift wrapping was a huge deal esp. if what you say that everyone was ok with it was true. so yea.... i wouldn't worry to much about sexist ideals coming from your gym teacher, i honestly don't think that he was being sexist i just think he was making a generalization which he would have corrected if anyone wanted to change.
  4. ok i was actually looking for femisim fails cards, thats the level i wanted to attack patriarchy
  5. Looking for any thing that says patriarchy good
  6. are you kidding me? i have great respect for all of the people fighting for america at home and abroad but if people that are in the armed forces want to be greeted like they were when they came home from WW2 instead of Vietnam, comments like "coming from an army soliders standpoint i say shoot the bastard." will only perpetuate sterotypes against the people serving in the armed forces.
  7. but what i don't understand is whether or not my points i made were correct in my first post on this thread.. no one actually commented on those
  8. why doesn't it answer back the arguement, all you say is that with the neg's interp of debate plan text would have to be so specific that the debate would never actually be acheived on the advantages of plan text. Plus i would also argue that if we specifiy metaphysics with plan text the neg team runs the next completely generic arguement o-spec which says we simply specify too much therefore we the aff team are trapped in a circle but never end up debating the advantages to plan text
  9. when you heard it how was it run? and what was their rational behind it? was it run saying something like our interp of the rez. is like something w/o material qualifications?
  10. ok so my post was deleted because i was stupid. i decided not to edit it and make it not stupid but just delete it and get rid of the stupidity all together. my bad.
  11. Umm.... let me see the religious differences between the sunnis and the shi'tes. Hm... also thats not point that i made at all i said that no insurgency came from toppling saddam, the insurgency actually came from other things. Also way to ignore the other facts in my post i really like how you did that. YAY for people who justify genocide!!!!
  12. removing saddam did change something. It did make life better for the Kurds and freed them from many genocidal efforts of saddam. While insurgency has dramatically increased since the fall of saddam it is hardly to blame for the fall of saddam. There are many reasons for the insurgency in Iraq but getting rid of saddam isn't one. Thanks for your input. Getting rid of Al-sadr would actually change things, while an assaination by the United States probably wouldn't be the best option possibly a assination cover-up by the cia would probably be the best option when dealing with assaination. P.S. You can't compare killing Al-sadr to the arrest of Saddam because they are two completely different things. Thanks for your input though i always appreicate it.
×
×
  • Create New...