ok so usually i feel pretty fine with the k
but i had a round a little while ago
where the aff was completely undercovering the case turns and all the offense i put on the perm
so they had no hope of winning those
and had focused their 1ar efforts onto winning the framework and their defense on the alternative
and so, in my 2nr, since i knew the only things they could possibly win in the 2ar were the framework and mitigating the sucess of the alt, i decided to allocate my time rather towards winning the case turns that i could access even if i lost the framework, especially since the perm was a lost cause for them
but, even though i clearly won teh case turns, the judge said he voted against me b/c he felt that their defense on the alt was sufficient and once they won their framework, it didnt matter. and when i asked him if he'd granted them full weight of case, he just said it didnt matter cause they'd won teh framework. their framework was simply that they could weigh the mpx of their advantages against the k.
am i a dumbass or was the judge?