Jump to content

jshepard

Member
  • Content Count

    558
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by jshepard


  1. My partner and I are running an ER case and I realize that alot of people think it isn't topical, however, if you interpret the resolution as "The USFG should substaintially decrease its authority to detain without charge" as the government should simply decrease its authority to detain w/o charge, in america or else where would it then be topical? Since the resolution doesn't specify that it must detain w/o charge on US soil, would that get around the T arguments? Any other ideas how to get around the T violations?

     

    Also, we were thinking of adding PDD 62 to our plan text and have the exectuive branch declare an EO nullifying PDD 62, would that be too specific? And does any one know if PDD 62 is already expired? Thanks!

     

    T- Detain

    A. [insert detain def.]

    B. Violation- Deportion, not detention

     

    Just toss in some standards and voters.

×
×
  • Create New...