Resolved: That the USFG should establish a foreign policy substancially increase its support of un peacekeeping operations
allright here is why sweet 16 is the most legit. t this year
1. ITS suggests that the "established foreign policy" should DIRECTLY support PKO...meaning 1325 and such although "support" is INDIRECT so its not topical or FXT (which is bad, blah blah blah)
2. and don't make a retarded argument like all plans are fxt...cause they're not, you can directly increase support of a UN PKO by giving money, just because it deals with the un doesn't mean that you randomly select a plan text.
3. if you establish a new pko, that is not going to help the un pko in the status quo, meaning you hurt them...i think everyone agrees with that.
4. one of the sixteen is ideal because it allows for the best debate(you can do the limits crap) but if you can win that the us had to directly increase support for un pko you would debate that giving support to all would just overlimit debate because, since rrf and gender are not topic, there's basically one case(increase support for all pko(support can be different)), so you allow for the perfect number of cases, more than one less than not topical(i know its not a number).
all the other t violations this year are stupid...so yea if you pity the ones who run this t violation i pity you for the t violation you run