Undefeated

Out of curiosity, where did GDS BB get their bid?

QFA

I will be applying.

BURLINGTON CADDO CCC CELEBRATION EDGEMONT GDS HANOVER HEAD ROYCE HOOCH KINKAID LAKELAND (Two teams) PACE ST MARX LEXINGTON (Two teams) RR ends tomorrow breaking to finals.

Anyone have full octos pairings?

Lexington wins the novice division.

1AC - Plantext: THE USFG SHOULD SEND ALL NECESSARY SUPPORT TO THE UN PKO IN THE GOLAN HEIGHTS. 1NC - Reads a short vagueness shell (concerning the words "all necessary means") and PICs out of providing troops to the Golan. 2AC - We don't send troops to the Golan. Abuse is fictional. 2NC - Um. We just got screwed over. The aff spiked out of our PIC because they had a vague plantext. I lost some critical ground. Aff conditionality is bad. 1AR - Abuse is fictional. 2NR - You just spiked a portion of your 1AC to get out of our CP. Aff conditionality is bad. Severence is bad. 2AR - Abuse is fictional.

Lexington will be sending teams.

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know why this tournament doesn't appear on the cross-x calendar?

If someone could post the teams that broke to doubles that'd be awesome.

Not true. Topical counterplans are fine (Courts, Consultation, Executive Order, etc...). Sure, it's a lot easier to defend a non-topical counterplan because most perms sever. But, restricting counterplan debate to textually competitive counterplans destroys a lot of key negative ground.

An affirmative plan is justified by the resolution. Each affirmative needs to advocate a certain subset of the res in order to validate it. I suppose the "theory" would be called hypotesting as one uses one instance of the res to prove the entirity of it.

Detroit Country Day

Anyone have quarters pairings?

Final Lexington Results "BM 2-4 GI 2-4 MP 3-3 DS 4-2 lost doubles to GBN FF GS 5-1 lost octos to GDS ZZ, beating Groves GW in doubles"