I'm not really looking for a debate here, but a couple of your arguments here amuse me- namely, that bid teams really aren't that much better than what you would see in MO. Then you go on to say "don't take this the wrong way, you guys still suck ("you guys"- glad to see elitism in the activity is still alive and kicking). So, your argument is that simultaneously Missouri kids suck at debate, but aren't really that far behind TOC bid teams, and that backfiles would go a long way to even the playing field.
Quite literally, you are saying that no one who does high school policy is good at debate. Am I wrong here? How else was that supposed to be taken?
And are you actually endorsing the idea that it's ok for judges to pass judgment on a team because of who is coaching/prepping them?