Papa Smurf
-
Content Count
3267 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
-
I am so offended that you call them "tommy's" rules
-
shit is hilarious
-
lol
-
lol
-
i always tend towards apple laptops because of the exceptional build quality and customer service. also of all the laptops i have taken apart they offer the cleanest setups which makes replacing parts (upgrading?) easy. however lenovo is also good personnally i'd just buy a netbook and a desktop for the same price hmm those are my thoughts
-
hehe lol
-
dear eagle hire me thanks
-
http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=83039& "For Leopard it appears that iAtkos is the easiest way. Since 10.5.1 Nvidia kexts doesn't work you need to boot with -s option (single user mode) at boot and delete or move NVDAResman.kext in order to boot in the GUI." http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=79526&
-
heh
-
ima buy one in three generations
-
attn: eagle hr, bk something, and the kids with the jameson aff
Papa Smurf replied to Papa Smurf's topic in Pacific
i think districts unless someone else needs a judge -
attn: eagle hr, bk something, and the kids with the jameson aff
Papa Smurf posted a topic in Pacific
need contacts please martinibouquet#gmail.com as always, if anyone is looking for coaching or whatever feel free to contact me judge guy with beard -
i saw how you dress with your pants you can't wear over boots and argyle accessories
-
heh
-
I want to change the way my state debates.
Papa Smurf replied to Nonkritikal debater's topic in Thoughts and Ideas
debating in idaho in high school it was effective for me to frame kritiks as case turns in front of judges who were less then receptive to them. rather than reading an alternative and focusing on impact scenarios i'd turn solvency due to an alternative causality for the harms. this way you get to frame your impacts in minor terms and are not as susceptible to getting bogged down and pigeon-holed in the impact (economic and state security) and agency/framework (hippies vs the government) debates that these judges may have bias towards. focus on particular arguments and evidence they make in the one ac and turn each independently - your links go on the advantages flow and your impacts on the solvency flow. so long as you frame your argument in terms of the one ac presented you afford yourself better ground on which to mediate your argument and avoid playing into any games that most teams would usually use to take advantage of you.
