Jump to content
kasn113

Is it untopical to hire?

Recommended Posts

I'm a debater in Indiana... so we're a bit behind. Anyways, some teams who went to nats said it is untopical to hire, i.e. judges, lawyers, etc. Should I listen to them, or did they just tell me that to have an advantage over me?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ronniesportman said:

yeah - it is untopical - Hiring judges/lawyers isn't removing a restriction on legal immigration. 

Alright, so in the instance of resolving the court clog, what is a topical thing to do?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, kasn113 said:

Alright, so in the instance of resolving the court clog, what is a topical thing to do?

I don't think hiring Lawyers is able to Solve, but rather saying smth like the plan streamlines the process that mitigates court clog. And how more applicants cause an increase in resource allocation to courts.  

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, ronniesportman said:

I don't think hiring Lawyers is able to Solve, but rather saying smth like the plan streamlines the process that mitigates court clog. And how more applicants cause an increase in resource allocation to courts.  

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be a great way to go about it. The only thing is most of the information needed to understand the plan's topicality is restricted to Valpo uni students. 

 

I'm sure there's other info out there saying the same thing, I'll just have to look for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Make the plan like reduce restrictions on legal immigration by requiring Judges to provide permanent relief by cancelling proceedings in cases where an allegedly removal person lacks legal counsel or it has been determined that they are unable to meaningfully participate in their defense.

Either A, they just get released and Get LPR

Or B, They get a fair trial with a lawyer

 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Jw4167 said:

 

Make the plan like reduce restrictions on legal immigration by requiring Judges to provide permanent relief by cancelling proceedings in cases where an allegedly removal person lacks legal counsel or it has been determined that they are unable to meaningfully participate in their defense.

Either A, they just get released and Get LPR

Or B, They get a fair trial with a lawyer

 

 

Great idea. I'm assuming that the lack of legal counsel would be the restriction here. Am I correct in assuming so?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

54 minutes ago, Jw4167 said:

 

Make the plan like reduce restrictions on legal immigration by requiring Judges to provide permanent relief by cancelling proceedings in cases where an allegedly removal person lacks legal counsel or it has been determined that they are unable to meaningfully participate in their defense.

Either A, they just get released and Get LPR

Or B, They get a fair trial with a lawyer

 

 

This is Fx T, the action itself is not topical, but the effects are

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...