Jump to content
Nonegfiat

Worst argument in debate

Recommended Posts

I like reading T substantial is of sizeable quality against like CTE or STEM affs, and saying they have to be specific about how much they are funding, and then tagging on a super specific spending DA in the 2NC. Also, running T substantial and then running like a politics DA and using the T as a link argument is super flashy, and from my experience at camp watching NSDA finals 2017, people seem to like it, too. That being said, neg lost that debate, so who knows. All I know is my camp judges reassured poor Pipkin (who was sitting outside because he couldn't bring himself to watch) that the neg probably won.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the spectre of that round haunts cross x

....Mearsheimer..is a dick.. and...an idiot...oOoOooOOoOoOOoo

Now that is a haunted meme

 

Side note - My Heidegger aff begins with "Fitter Happier" so I can't really roast that Radiohead round lmao.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as to answer the thread question, RVIs are pretty garbage imo. Like I'll read them because in LD you have to but I hate them so much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...