Jump to content
UsernameUsername

Nuclear War does not save 40 quadrillion people

Recommended Posts

What's the scenario for it saving people?

saving them from the sufferring that is the life we all live? I assume its a quantified (kinda???) schopenhauer-like arguement? I know thats a butcher of the theory, don’t need to tell me, but its the closest relation i see Edited by GracchusBabeuf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think OP is referring to a more traditional Spark-esque argument i.e. Nuclear Winter won't cause extinction but will destroy enough of the population to solve Overpop, etc.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The case is about saving biodiversity and eradicating diseases through a nuclear war.

 

Just say that nuclear war kills things, which inherently decreases biodiversity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...