Jump to content
NativeWarlock

Surveillance- NativeWarlock (A) vs Luhan (N)

Recommended Posts

What kind of surveillance is involved?

What is the impact?

What is the gender matrix?

What role does bio-power play in this?

What's bad about the status quo you describe?

Your second "Preciado" card says that bio-power is now "irreversible," so how can you fix it?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of surveillance is involved?

Somatic policing

 

What is the impact?

The non-existance of our political subjectivity.

 

What is the gender matrix?

The capitalist projection of the male-female binary.

 

What role does bio-power play in this?

I mean the surveillance state controls our gender- that's control over our biology.

 

What's bad about the status quo you describe?

Gender binaries.

 

Your second "Preciado" card says that bio-power is now "irreversible," so how can you fix it?

The irreversible aspect is that of the techno-living. We think the 1ac isn't a question of how we curtail the techno-living's existance, rather how we orient ourselves to it. Edited by NativeWarlock
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can judge, fine with anything, just impact out your offense to the framing, make the layers of the debate clear so I don't evaluate something that you think is on a lower level, (Kritiks), over something you think is on a higher level, (T/theory). I default to reasonability on T/Theory, but that's only if you don't give me another way to weigh. Please make interaction clear, I think that K vs K is terrible when noone does their work, but can be great if you make the effort required, so please explain interactions. I prefer good analysis and extensions on warrants over a dump of 20 new heg bad cards in response to a single heg good card. I think that using a single good warrant can beat back any number of cards, but, again, you need to do that work.
Any specific questions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question, how do you plan to solve?

A few ways.

 

Preciado says that dis-identication is effective. This is when we realize how hegemonic classes represent us, and detach ourselves from this image. In this case, the self-experimentation of the AFF detaches itself from capitalism.

 

Preciado says that producing discourse within the academy is key to political autonomy- but the question is what type of discourse we produce. In order to mitigate gender binaries, our affirmation of gender hijacking is a mode of self-experimentation in which we wreck control over our bodies.

 

Halberstam says that just the idea of our affirmation is good- taking a risk on our discourse is better than stagnant politics that enforce gender violence.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Open for CX.

Substantially

if I curtail 29% of surveillance do you lose any off case positions??

 

How did the 1ac curtail less than 30%? (How can u prove it)

 

Curtail:

do we have to use the state to curtail surveillance?

 

Surveillance:

What's data?

 

The K;

How does the 1ac hinder te alt?

 

That WSM ev be like the State is sexist towards women- how does that account for transgender bodies?

 

The biopower link just says the state uses biopower... how the hell did the 1ac trigger more state-owned biopower?

 

What does the alt look like?

 

CP:

What's "E"?

 

How does one identify as E? (i mean like do we have to like re-do our birth certificates or...?)

 

Michigan Journal of Gender and Law says our passports could say we are E- do we have to rely on State issued articles to identify as one gender identity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can judge, fine with anything, just impact out your offense to the framing, make the layers of the debate clear so I don't evaluate something that you think is on a lower level, (Kritiks), over something you think is on a higher level, (T/theory). I default to reasonability on T/Theory, but that's only if you don't give me another way to weigh. Please make interaction clear, I think that K vs K is terrible when noone does their work, but can be great if you make the effort required, so please explain interactions. I prefer good analysis and extensions on warrants over a dump of 20 new heg bad cards in response to a single heg good card. I think that using a single good warrant can beat back any number of cards, but, again, you need to do that work.

Any specific questions?

Anything specific you mean by "interaction" on the k vs k flow? Or just general comparisons on the line by line?

 

Thanx for judging!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah i'll figure something out with the 2ac lol but i guess i'm chill with the 1nc..

Oops. If you'd like, I can kick out of the K.

CX answers will be up shortly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...