Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have an upcoming tournament and I'm writing an anthropocentrism bad case. Yet the normal V/C doesn't really fit. How would I write a ROB? Or is there a framework that I could use?

 

Thanks in advance!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good ROB fits your needs and is justified. Depending on the alt of your k, the ROB should be fit around your alt but also leave room for other advocacies to exist. For example, the ROB that I use for Heidegger + poesis is to vote for the best mindset. That makes it easy for me to win with a poesis alt, but it gives the other team opportunities to not be totally crowded out. Therefore, the ROB isn't self-serving, but you'll still win with it.

 

For anthro, it's also going to depend on your impact and the impacts of the aff. If the aff is identity, you can claim root cause and use their own role of the ballot (implying it's not hyperspecific). You can even take on a utilitarian ROB and claim that you're helping the most amount of nonhuman lives.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...