bammytess 12 Report post Posted March 18, 2015 I have an upcoming tournament and I'm writing an anthropocentrism bad case. Yet the normal V/C doesn't really fit. How would I write a ROB? Or is there a framework that I could use? Thanks in advance!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NovaPlasm 46 Report post Posted March 18, 2015 Anthro bad as in an affirmative case, or as a negative kritik? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bammytess 12 Report post Posted March 18, 2015 Anthro bad as in an affirmative case, or as a negative kritik? It would be an off for the 1NC. (Sorry) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NovaPlasm 46 Report post Posted March 18, 2015 It would be an off for the 1NC. (Sorry) What's the alt? (OOO, Ecopadagogy, etc) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
agl125 218 Report post Posted March 19, 2015 hydrologics! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raybadursh 108 Report post Posted March 19, 2015 A good ROB fits your needs and is justified. Depending on the alt of your k, the ROB should be fit around your alt but also leave room for other advocacies to exist. For example, the ROB that I use for Heidegger + poesis is to vote for the best mindset. That makes it easy for me to win with a poesis alt, but it gives the other team opportunities to not be totally crowded out. Therefore, the ROB isn't self-serving, but you'll still win with it. For anthro, it's also going to depend on your impact and the impacts of the aff. If the aff is identity, you can claim root cause and use their own role of the ballot (implying it's not hyperspecific). You can even take on a utilitarian ROB and claim that you're helping the most amount of nonhuman lives. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
