Jump to content
Solax10

This weekend's politics scenarios?

Recommended Posts

Hi as tomorrow most people will be competing I was wondering what some popular congress scenarios will be. I read that keystone will be voted on next week so that will probably win on uniqueness although I know TPA is possibly still floating around. Also on keystone how would the scenario differentiate from the classic plan cost pc and pc is key?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi as tomorrow most people will be competing I was wondering what some popular congress scenarios will be. I read that keystone will be voted on next week so that will probably win on uniqueness although I know TPA is possibly still floating around. Also on keystone how would the scenario differentiate from the classic plan cost pc and pc is key?

 

We'll be putting a couple scenarios out tomorrow morning along with aff answers.

 

If you want to be the first to find out when it comes out, sign up here:

 

http://tinyurl.com/Jan16PTXsignup

 

  • Downvote 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll be putting a couple scenarios out tomorrow morning along with aff answers.

If you want to be the first to find out when it comes out, sign up here:

 

http://tinyurl.com/Jan16PTXsignup

 

I like how you quoted OP's post like you were going to answer it, and then suggested he pay money for a politics file when he's clearly already got one.
  • Upvote 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi as tomorrow most people will be competing I was wondering what some popular congress scenarios will be. I read that keystone will be voted on next week so that will probably win on uniqueness although I know TPA is possibly still floating around. Also on keystone how would the scenario differentiate from the classic plan cost pc and pc is key?

It's still based on PC; Obama needs PC to prevent a veto proof majority and the plan costs PC... although too be honest i think that TPA is going to be the most run da because uq on keystone is a bit iffy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like how you quoted OP's post like you were going to answer it, and then suggested he pay money for a politics file when he's clearly already got one.

 

Not sure how it's clear that he has a PTX file, if someone doesn't know what's up and coming in congress they quite clearly haven't done any research in the past week. Easiest way to inform yourself would be to skim Google News' homepage.

 

On a note of specificity - if he's got a file, it's likely pretty not good, dude went 0-3 last weekend out on the neg.

 

http://www.joyoftournaments.com/defn/14/6/140696/2015%20WWI%20VCX%20Packet.pdf

 

Recent, high-quality evidence wins rounds.

  • Downvote 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how it's clear that he has a PTX file, if someone doesn't know what's up and coming in congress they quite clearly haven't done any research in the past week. Easiest way to inform yourself would be to skim Google News' homepage.

 

On a note of specificity - if he's got a file, it's likely pretty not good, dude went 0-3 last weekend out on the neg.

 

http://www.joyoftournaments.com/defn/14/6/140696/2015%20WWI%20VCX%20Packet.pdf

 

Recent, high-quality evidence wins rounds.

Dude, you're an asshole

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how it's clear that he has a PTX file, if someone doesn't know what's up and coming in congress they quite clearly haven't done any research in the past week. Easiest way to inform yourself would be to skim Google News' homepage.

 

On a note of specificity - if he's got a file, it's likely pretty not good, dude went 0-3 last weekend out on the neg.

 

http://www.joyoftournaments.com/defn/14/6/140696/2015%20WWI%20VCX%20Packet.pdf

 

Recent, high-quality evidence wins rounds.

 

First dude is gendered language and I really don't appreciate that. Next I have done research in the past week that's how I know Keystone is being voted soon. Also I went 0-3 last weekend because we only hit K affs which when we live in a lay area we aren't experienced in K affs, and politics vs K aff's don't work. Finally, you really are an asshole.

Edited by Solax10
  • Upvote 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how it's clear that he has a PTX file, if someone doesn't know what's up and coming in congress they quite clearly haven't done any research in the past week. Easiest way to inform yourself would be to skim Google News' homepage.

 

On a note of specificity - if he's got a file, it's likely pretty not good, dude went 0-3 last weekend out on the neg.

 

http://www.joyoftournaments.com/defn/14/6/140696/2015%20WWI%20VCX%20Packet.pdf

 

Recent, high-quality evidence wins rounds.

 

This grammar makes me assume your "high-quality evidence" is bullshit 

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This grammar makes me assume your "high-quality evidence" is bullshit 

 

You know what they say about assumptions.... 

 

I think my use of "pretty not good" was better than the alternative of calling it "bad" but the grammar police gets what they want in this instance. 

 

First dude is gendered language and I really don't appreciate that. Next I have done research in the past WEEK that's how I know Keystone is being voted soon. Also I went 0-3 last weekend because we only hit K affs which when we live in a lay area we aren't experienced in K affs, and politics vs K aff's DOESN'T work. Finally, you really are an asshole.

 

 

MORAL: Don't feed the trolls

 

 

AND

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM

  • Downvote 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know what they say about assumptions.... 

 

I think my use of "pretty not good" was better than the alternative of calling it "bad" but the grammar police gets what they want in this instance. 

 

 

 

MORAL: Don't feed the trolls

 

 

AND

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know what they say about assumptions.... 

 

I think my use of "pretty not good" was better than the alternative of calling it "bad" but the grammar police gets what they want in this instance. 

 

 

 

MORAL: Don't feed the trolls

 

 

AND

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM

y u ruining a good song :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I know this is probably going to come off as trollish, but I want you to know that this is without contest at least my 14th favorite favorite song and I haven't heard it for probably 5 months, and hearing this just made my day!

 

Thanks man.

 

 

y u ruining a good song :(

 

I don't mean to ruin it, I just think the lyrics really speak to me right now:

 

Because the haters gonna hate,

And I'm just gonna shake - shake - shake,

Shake it off.

Shake it off.

 

:)

  • Downvote 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To, you know, answer the question, Iran Sanctions is top of the docket right now. There's a committee vote on Tuesday and Congress is pushing hard to get new sanctions in light of a possible resolution to the deal. TPA is probably behind that. Those are really the only two big, big things atm (that I've seen when doing my own PTX research) but technically Cuba and Immigration something or other are still in the background, but Obama's not actually spending any PC on them really and Congress has sidetracked those.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Business 101: Piss off all potential customers.

 

That's... that's how things work, right?

 

Let's just remember that this just started off with me offering help...

 

We'll be putting a couple scenarios out tomorrow morning along with aff answers.

 

If you want to be the first to find out when it comes out, sign up here:

 

http://tinyurl.com/Jan16PTXsignup

 

 

And then the trollz hijacked the thread :x  ....

 

I like how you quoted OP's post like you were going to answer it, and then suggested he pay money for a politics file when he's clearly already got one.

 

And I regretfully respectfully responded (up-vote for alliteration)  using some facts that were public knowledge and at my disposal, but said nothing insulting or mean:

 

 

Not sure how it's clear that he has a PTX file, if someone doesn't know what's up and coming in congress they quite clearly haven't done any research in the past week. Easiest way to inform yourself would be to skim Google News' homepage.

 

On a note of specificity - if he's got a file, it's likely pretty not good, dude went 0-3 last weekend out on the neg.

 

http://www.joyoftournaments.com/defn/14/6/140696/2015%20WWI%20VCX%20Packet.pdf

 

Recent, high-quality evidence wins rounds.

 

And then people called me names... :confused:

 

Dude, you're an asshole

 

Finally, you really are an asshole.

 

And then I got sad, so I started listening to some Taylor Swift.

 

And then someone wanted me to call someone's file "bad" instead of "pretty not good" even though I hadn't seen it.

 

This grammar makes me assume your "high-quality evidence" is bullshit*

 

*note: even my bullshit evidence is high quality

And then I posted my favorite Taylor Swift Song hoping cooler heads would prevail....

 

 

You know what they say about assumptions.... 

 

I think my use of "pretty not good" was better than the alternative of calling it "bad" but the grammar police gets what they want in this instance. 

 

 

 

MORAL: Don't feed the trolls

 

 

AND

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM

 

...They did not, but someone posted my favorite Cee Lo Green Song!!!

 

 

 

And the poster that didn't understand my use of "pretty not good" used bad grammar to accuse me of ruining my favorite Taylor Swift Song...

 

 

y u ruining a good song :(

 

...but I didn't mind because I was pretty sure that the poster finally understood my use of "pretty not good"

 

AND NOW WE ARE HERE

 

So I decided to share my 4th favorite Taylor Swift song...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYa1eI1hpDE

Edited by DebatePTX
  • Downvote 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's just remember that this just started off with me offering help...

 

 

And then the trollz hijacked the thread :x  ....

 

 

And I regretfully respectfully responded (up-vote for alliteration)  using some facts that were public knowledge and at my disposal, but said nothing insulting or mean:

 

 

 

And then people called me names... :confused:

 

 

 

And then I got sad, so I started listening to some Taylor Swift.

 

And then someone wanted me to call someone's file "bad" instead of "pretty not good" even though I hadn't seen it.

 

 

*note: even my bullshit evidence is high quality

And then I posted my favorite Taylor Swift Song hoping cooler heads would prevail....

 

 

 

...They did not, but someone posted my favorite Cee Lo Green Song!!!

 

 

 

And the poster that didn't understand my use of "pretty not good" used bad grammar to accuse me of ruining my favorite Taylor Swift Song...

 

 

 

...but I didn't mind because I was pretty sure that the poster finally understood my use of "pretty not good"

 

AND NOW WE ARE HERE

 

So I decided to share my 4th favorite Taylor Swift song...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYa1eI1hpDE

is this tumblr now?

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

#dude we post a thursday file free - Like do alittle research on the UQ then scenario are runnable / the community dont need your file ,we are independentttttttttttttt from that captialist mechanism of y'alls buying files

  • Upvote 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...