Jump to content
Level1Bulbasaur

Atalantis Aff thoughts

Recommended Posts

The aff could no link any K by just saying "our interpretation isn't that bad thing you say it is". Your inter of debate would make it wayyyy too hard to get any links to anything. 

Not really, there are still plenty of links that aren't based off of reading into something. For example, any apoc rhet bad arg would still link, as would anything that's based off of the effects of the plan such as cap or neoliberalism or what have you. It would be more accurate that it would be hard to garner links to things that the affirmative doesn't explicitly defend, which I personally don't care much for as argumentation; at that point you're not engaging with the affirmative but latching onto to something that isn't necessarily there (speaking in the generic sense of affirmatives) as a way to screen out and nullify any offense and ignore the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really, there are still plenty of links that aren't based off of reading into something. For example, any apoc rhet bad arg would still link, as would anything that's based off of the effects of the plan such as cap or neoliberalism or what have you. It would be more accurate that it would be hard to garner links to things that the affirmative doesn't explicitly defend, which I personally don't care much for as argumentation; at that point you're not engaging with the affirmative but latching onto to something that isn't necessarily there (speaking in the generic sense of affirmatives) as a way to screen out and nullify any offense and ignore the case.

Pfffftt, we're not THAT type of apocalyptic rhetoric! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...