Jump to content
Coconuts

BobbyS (Aff) vs. JaredCroitoru (Neg) LA res (Round 2)

Recommended Posts

1. Killer Aff

2. ROB please -Just trying to find insure i have right

3. FW = star any spefic cards

4.Is US uniquely key?

5.Explain the Joren evidence - more towards how this even apply to the rest of case 

6. The i/l scenario - is it the Clark evidence ?

7. Do you solve for suffering then?

8.Is the guilt riding in ?

9.timeframe  for solving ?

10 .Cant you find a policy to change , in order to start actual change of border policy?

11.Do you use the USfg?

12. What is ethical priori question - if their is one 

13. cool with some follow up questions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Killer Aff

2. ROB please -Just trying to find insure i have right

Not really a specific role of the ballot as of the 1AC

3. FW = star any spefic cards

Pretty much every 1AC card is an argument against FW

4.Is US uniquely key?

...the US? We don't defend the US.

5.Explain the Joren evidence - more towards how this even apply to the rest of case 

Joronen talks about trying to control things outside our possibilities, or our finitute. Specifically, we're trying to control the migrant Other and nature by building huge walls.

6. The i/l scenario - is it the Clark evidence ?

All of the 1AC feeds into the impacts, not just the Clark evidence

7. Do you solve for suffering then?

We don't "solve" suffering, we just can't put judgements on Others.

8.Is the guilt riding in ?

I really wouldn't say "guilt" is the right word, simply an ethical need to do it.

9.timeframe  for solving ?

Linear time frame, everytime we read this aff we solve a bit more. We've probably solved a bit more by putting the 1AC here, and we will have solved more through an aff ballot at the end of the round.

10 .Cant you find a policy to change , in order to start actual change of border policy?

Nope

11.Do you use the USfg?

No

12. What is ethical priori question - if their is one 

As of the 1AC, the only ethical question deals with passing our judgements on Others, specifically the migrant.

13. cool with some follow up questions?

Yea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. So why dont you solve the migrant's solving 

2.explain the impact scenario's ?

3.  Arent they suffering for this ?

4.Do you solve all scenario's of Otherazation?

5.Why not help for others opression?

6. So then why vote aff?

7.Why not any policy actions ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. So why dont you solve the migrant's solving 

Sorry? Could you rephrase?

2.explain the impact scenario's ?

Genocide, standing reserve, and extinction of all matter is a bastardized version of it

3.  Arent they suffering for this ?

I really dont understand this either

4.Do you solve all scenario's of Otherazation?

If everyone adopted the same view point yes, but we start in the debate community.

5.Why not help for others opression?

We help all oppression, just pinpoint it to specific migration issues along the 'border."

6. So then why vote aff?

7.Why not any policy actions ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.So you solve for all suffering?

2.How much is substanial amount of suffering?

3.What is quantifiable?

4.How much migrant thorugh the borders ?

5.How can solve all opression?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.So you solve for all suffering?

No, if people adopted the viewpoint of embracing all Otherness that'd solve, but the 1AC does not directly solve for all suffering.

2.How much is substanial amount of suffering?

*Shrug*

3.What is quantifiable?

*Shrug*

4.How much migrant thorugh the borders ?

It should be all migrants.

5.How can solve all opression?

#1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Ok last set of questions : 

1.  So then is every migrant the same ?

2. Why vote aff ? 

3. Lastly are you going to defend all words in the plan text ?

4. So why dont you solve all suffering ? 

5. Then why just leave it at the migrants suffering ?

6. If we prove someone else is suffering worse then do we also solve better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Ok last set of questions : 

1.  So then is every migrant the same ?

No, we are all migrants.

2. Why vote aff ? 

The aff begins a shift in ethics towards the people our resolutions hurt.

3. Lastly are you going to defend all words in the plan text ?

Yea

4. So why dont you solve all suffering ? 

No one action can solve all suffering, but a switch in ethics can help.

5. Then why just leave it at the migrants suffering ?

We're not white knights and we can't solve things that are out of our control, but we can control our relationship to migration.

6. If we prove someone else is suffering worse then do we also solve better?

"Proving" someone suffers is not what the aff does. We actually create a change in the debate community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 Ok last set of questions : 

1.  So then is every migrant the same ?

No, we are all migrants.

2. Why vote aff ? 

The aff begins a shift in ethics towards the people our resolutions hurt.

3. Lastly are you going to defend all words in the plan text ?

Yea

4. So why dont you solve all suffering ? 

No one action can solve all suffering, but a switch in ethics can help.

5. Then why just leave it at the migrants suffering ?

We're not white knights and we can't solve things that are out of our control, but we can control our relationship to migration.

6. If we prove someone else is suffering worse then do we also solve better?

"Proving" someone suffers is not what the aff does. We actually create a change in the debate community.

 

#thedream

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 Ok last set of questions : 

1.  So then is every migrant the same ?

No, we are all migrants.

#We'reNeverNotMigrants

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is blackness?

 

What is a person?

 

What is fiat?

 

Status of the advocacies?

 

Are you advocating the resolution?

 

Why are you making me us the "United States federal government" if it is indeed antiblack like your cards talk about?

 

What is a topical version of the aff?

 

What is "instrumental affirmation of the resolution?"

 

"fully equalize a person's status" I thought equality was bad though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1.Slavery 

2.Redefine the  question 

3.Dispo , except FW and T 

4.Yes on the Rez question

5. That is a question for topicality - first  you have to win you are topical

6.on the topical verison - you have the United State opening up the borders to mexico : Their are so many other affs you can run - litterally all u need to do is have the USfg doing something 

7. Advocacies do not interfere with each other unless all went for the 2NR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...