Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Topicality is still a thing right? Or did all of the K teams win that whole "T = Berube 97 levels of genocide" thing yet? 

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst case I've heard all year.Un-topical  to the tenth power. Also, only human rights and perception solvency.
I saw one that had a bio dev harm, but it was a "maybe harm".

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Worst case I've heard all year.Un-topical  to the tenth power. Also, only human rights and perception solvency.

I saw one that had a bio dev harm, but it was a "maybe harm".

 

I mean, endless WoT affs

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read Gitmo, and surprisingly, we haven't really dropped that many rounds on T this year, like maybe 3 or 4. We word our plan text to increase the amount of economic assets Cuba has or something alone those lines. Once you get T blocked out good, you can win with it. Keep in mind you're literally giving them the land back. But, I think more than anything, we've won rounds because no one answers the K we put on Ts..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or you can read it as an intentionally non-topical affirmative, I cut an aff like that at camp and saw it do quite well at Bronx.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...