Jump to content
JohnCenaDEBATE

Heideggerean Aff

Recommended Posts

I think I would claim the transportation infrastructure as the method of thinking that you are advocating (imagination, reflection).

 

Otherwise, i think you end up being totally anti-topical.

 

Is this a tech bad/tech thinking bad and a fear bad aff?

 

The other way--is an endorsement of the resolution because it allows us to challenge the assumptions of the resolution. Justification being that criticism and engagement of the issues surrounding transportation is good. (ie transportation debate key....transportation criticism key....not transportation good).

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How are you framing the affirmation or the ballot?

 

I assume you saw the article on fear that was recently posted in the Help forum--something about fear--I assume its the author you need.

 

How do you answer enemies good?

How do you fear good?

How threats real--can't ignore them (and we're not totally paranoid)?

How do you answer transition violence?

In about 30 to 35% of your rounds....you may not have the full weight of your value to life claims. What then?

How do you answer Foucault's fairness argument on framework?

 

These are more intended for reflection.....but feel free to provide insight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i know how dumb this makes me sound, but im just going to go out and say it can anybody explain Heidegger to me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...