Jump to content
liampirate

Round 397: [MILITARY] Jsmith (aff) vs. liampirate (neg)

Recommended Posts

1. So if I win that saving the economy is good, should the judges vote AFF? If not, why?

Well, its all comparitive. Think of all our impact turns as DA's to your plan. If you win a low risk of the DA, but we win a lower risk of case, we win.

2. Why is your Apps 10 card not empirically denied after Libya?

the economy was ok then, and Libya is not the level of war goldstein is talking about

3. Your Goldstein 87 card (the new 2NC one) says we fight wars when we're in a good economic standing. Weren't we in a recession post-9/11?

9/11 was not a war, and we continued to fight in wars after we invaded

That's all for now. Maybe more...

1nr is almost done, but its sunny in seattle, so im going to hang out for a few hours

 

Also - we need more judges

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Um, Liam, that was only an hour and a half.

Much less than a few hours.

 

I spent 1 hour at a park, and then I spent 15 minutes drinking coffee and reading, and then 15 minutes answering conditionality. And then i posted my speech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I spent 1 hour at a park, and then I spent 15 minutes drinking coffee and reading, and then 15 minutes answering conditionality. And then i posted my speech

 

Either way, you're loosing speaks for lying.

 

/jk

Edited by InTheFlesh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...