Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
CRusso

Round: 377: [MILITARY] CRusso (aff) vs. Firewater (neg)

Recommended Posts

Sorry, lot of school work.

T

1. Why do our first 4 we meets not apply?

2. How do you lose ground when there's more PMCs in Afghanistan than any other form of presence? Wouldn't this give you more access to credibility DAs, stability DAs, POLITICS DAs, lol to name a few?

3. What's the point of your extra T section?

4. How do you lose ground if we're still removing a substantial amount of military presence?

De-Dev

5. What economic system will be used post-collapse?

6. Your evidence on transition says that the "people" will not be violent. How does this effect the elites in power, or are they just going to chill while there's a people's revolution going on?

7. Your Lewis evidence says millions will die. Doesn't this grant a pretty large risk of war?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, lot of school work.

T

1. Why do our first 4 we meets not apply?

Because the interp is that PMC's are not Military/Police Presence, not that they don't belong to the US.

2. How do you lose ground when there's more PMCs in Afghanistan than any other form of presence? Wouldn't this give you more access to credibility DAs, stability DAs, POLITICS DAs, lol to name a few?

not really, since most of the links for the topic are supposed to be based on the removal of military or police prescence, not PMC's

 

3. What's the point of your extra T section?

just that at most, given your interpretations you're extra T, and it's another reason just a reason to reject you from here onwards.

4. How do you lose ground if we're still removing a substantial amount of military presence?

because we aren't learning about military presence because PMC's aren't part of the military

De-Dev

5. What economic system will be used post-collapse?

Any possible, it could be capitalist, it's most likely not, but the point is that regardless of the system that's picked, the people would make distinct changes to prevent the flaws in the status squo, so long as the people make these changes, then it doesn't matter what the system is, that's the Lundberg evidence.

 

6. Your evidence on transition says that the "people" will not be violent. How does this effect the elites in power, or are they just going to chill while there's a people's revolution going on?

they will be affected, they'd be in the group of the "people". we don't make a distinction, just because they are rich doesn't mean that they are excluded from being in the movement.

7. Your Lewis evidence says millions will die. Doesn't this grant a pretty large risk of war?

I mean sure, but even if millions die from the wars that occur because growth collapses, it's better than if the human race goes extinct from not having an ecosystem or such.

1NR + Text

http://www.mediafire.com/?q14wnyoij3l1vl1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...